Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and the lecture offer two opposing views on the arguements about the power of Pterosausrs for flight. Whereas the author of the reading suggests that skepticals don't believe that Pterosaurs could fly, the lecturer states that the evidences shows that they had the ability to fly. She casts doubt on the mein points made in the lecture by providing three reasons.
First, according to the text, Pterosaurs were cold-booded because they werer kind of reptiles, and as a result, they did not have sufficient energy for flying. However, the lecturer disputes that due to the fossils of Prerosaurs which have a kind of dence hair like fur, they were able of keeping their bodies' temperature high. Consequently, they supplyed them enough energy for flight.
Secondly, the reading claims that Pterosaurs were too large and heavy to be able for flying. Nevertheless, the lecturer implies that owing to the light, hollow bones that they had, they were weighing lightly. Therefore, Pterosaurs could keep airborne with lower energy.
Finally, although the text states that Petrosaurs had very weak back-legs which made them difficult to run fast and jump as high as birds, the lecturer explains that they had four limbs in comparison to the birds with only two limbs. Moreover, she says that because of the use of their four limbs, they could push thir bodies and run rapidly, and so jump highly, and they had no difficulty to fly.
To recap, the lecture and the text provide the three contradict opinions about wheter Pterosaurs could fly or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...of the reading suggests that skepticals dont believe that Pterosaurs could fly, the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99613899614 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44213911763 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555984555985 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5455652522 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.833333333 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218808989197 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829621688946 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821306671397 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113693739588 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762214830422 0.0443174109184 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.