In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Humans are capable and intelligent creatures that can achieve whatever they want. They use all of their abilities to move the boundaries of their achievements. They would use either their imaginations or knowledge to advance. However, it’s not correct that in the majority of the professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than information and knowledge.
To begin with, we cannot ignore that imagination is the most important part of the various fields. In fact, fields that need creativity, such as painting, music, writing and so forth, imagination plays a significant role in course of creating the novel painting, song, and a piece of writing. Artists should primarily use their imaginations to create a piece of art that will be unique among others. In these fields, knowledge would be inferior in comparison to imagination. However, in other fields such as scientific fields, knowledge plays the main role in achieving the goals. The number of fields that require great deal of information rather than imagination is higher than the number of areas that need mostly imagination. Therefore, the statement is incorrect in this way.
Numerous fields such as Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, Astronomy, etc. have built upon the past achievements reached by the past scholars. No one without sufficient knowledge about the basic rules of Mathematics or Physics cannot do research in these fields. Every piece of knowledge in the scientific fields is like the rings of a chain that continues the previous information. Therefore, a freshman majoring, for example, in Physics is less likely to reach an outstanding achievement in Quantum. He must first, pass many courses in the university to obtain the requirements and necessary knowledge about the basics of Quantum, and ultimately and probably in the graduate school he will do research in Quantum field and reach an achievement. Imagination won’t be an important part in such fields. Also, these scientific fields are based on the logics and everything that is logical needs enough information, and not the imagination, to remain in its correct logic.
Moreover, many practical fields and professions need experience and hours of work rather than imagination. Surgeons, for instance, to become capable of operating a patient, successfully, must pass hundreds of hours practicing and observing surgeries. Patients expect their surgeon to be skillful and well-experienced, rather than having a good imagination. Likewise, many professions are required to pass a specific amount of time in internships to gain enough experience and knowledge. Therefore, imagination has no place in such fields.
All in all, it would be unfair that we ignore imagination in the abstract fields such as art, but in the most fields of science, knowledge plays the most important role in the achievements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 781, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the statement is incorrect in this way. Numerous fields such as Mathematics, Phy...
^^^
Line 4, column 539, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...magination has no place in such fields. All in all, it would be unfair that we i...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st important role in the achievements.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2420.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38975501114 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05765907541 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489977728285 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 738.0 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9804293436 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.96 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191863636026 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552857791774 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054758602453 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121923428866 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526404913692 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.