Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture offer two opposing views on asteroids as an alternative colonization. Whereas the author of the reading suggests that asteroids provide great opportunities for develop colony on them, the lecturer enumerates three reasons to reject this concept. He challenges the idea by explaining the three following facts.
First, according to the text, having low gravity in asteroids, easier landing and taking off could be provided for spacecrafts. In this case, crafts could carry more necessary objects for astronauts, and their easier take off allows them to use their remained fuel back to Earth. However, the lecturer disputes that low gravity has many negative effects on astronauts' health such as reducing bone density and loosing muscle’s mass, which hurt colonists’ body.
Secondly, the author claims that asteroids have many cherished minerals which is lucrative to mining, finding, and transferring to Earth. Although, the lecturer believes that supporting the colony and transferring the precious minerals to Earth have noticeable expenses, which will lessen the worth of fulfilling this idea. Moreover, he asserts that in case of mining lots of minerals, their prices in the market would decline. Consequently, it will decrease the profit of the mission.
Finally, the reading mentions that the asteroids are in near Earth, and reaching and returning from them would take lower time than other planets, but the lecturer implies that the asteroids are orbiting erratically. He explains that it would be possible to reach them easily, but they change their path regularly, which makes the returning procedure more challenging.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture offer two op...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... explaining the three following facts. First, according to the text, having low...
^^^^
Line 2, column 361, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'astronauts'' or 'astronaut's'?
Suggestion: astronauts'; astronaut's
...ow gravity has many negative effects on astronauts health such as reducing bone density an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le’s mass, which hurt colonists’ body. Secondly, the author claims that asteroi...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll decrease the profit of the mission. Finally, the reading mentions that the a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 256.0 407.700716846 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50390625 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72560815587 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61328125 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6348232797 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.416666667 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0967984220576 0.236089414692 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377180938726 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034367582885 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0624711485587 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425523297638 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.