Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and the lecture offer two opposing views on asteroids as an alternative colonization. Whereas the author of the reading suggets that asteroids provide great opportunities for develop colony on them, the lecturer enumerates three reasons to reject this concept. He challenges the idea by explaining the three following facts.
First, according to the text, having low gravity in asteroids, easier landing and taking off could be provided for spacecrafts. However, the lecturer desputes that low gravity has many negative effects on astrenauts' health such as reduscing bone denses and loosing mucsle's mass.
Secondly, the author claims that asteroids have many cherished minerals which is lucretive to mining, finding, and transfering to Earth, although, the lecturer believes that supporting the colony and transfering the precious minerals to Earth have noticeable expenses, which will deteroid the worth of fulfilling this idea. Moreover, he states that this sources in asteroide will be ending, and leads to downturn of their market.
Finally, despite the fact that the text mentions that the asteroids are in near Earth and reaching and returning from them would take lower time than other planets, the lecturer implies that the asteroids are orbiting eratically, and it would be possible to reach them easily, but they change their path regularly, which makes the returning procedure more challenging.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture offer two op...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... explaining the three following facts. First, according to the text, having low...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... bone denses and loosing mucsles mass. Secondly, the author claims that asteroi...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and leads to downturn of their market. Finally, despite the fact that the text ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 52.1666666667 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 1977.66487455 61% => OK
No of words: 218.0 407.700716846 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51834862385 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.48103885553 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68232547623 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637614678899 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 618.680645161 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.443749811 48.9658058833 211% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 150.375 100.406767564 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.45110844103 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101575050239 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493384872632 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257143838151 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599109129656 0.150856017488 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342340966845 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 11.7677419355 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.01818996416 127% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.