The reading and the lecture both are about the benefits of solar energy. The author of the reading states that advantages of the solar energy are positive and should be supportive for production. The lecturer builds upon those same ideas to give a more comprehensive picture by providing three reasons.
To begin with, according to the reading, the first benefit of solar energy is to reduce the consumption of non-renewable sources of energy. There is no fear of producing solar energy. To support this idea, the lecturer goes on to explain that it can be considered as clean renewable energy. As it has a long life span, people should not worry about the production of it. Furthermore, he mentions that it is also a non-pollutant that is great for the environment.
Secondly, the reading asserts that burning fuel is a great source of pollution on the earth; however, solar energy does not affect pollution. The lecturer further illustrates that solar energy can be used in multiple ways. If the authority is given to the public, personal will control the energy. This makes people more responsible for the conservation of energy. Moreover, he mentions that people won't waste energy.
Finally, the writer of the article claims that solar energy is cheap as compared to fuel. Once people spend money on it; they should not invest for a long time. To advocate this idea, the speaker posits that people can sell the excess energy. Besides, solar energy will become the source of income in the family.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nd should be supportive for production. The lecturer builds upon those same ideas t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 254.0 407.700716846 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92519685039 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59779579588 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527559055118 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9475974881 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.5882352941 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9411764706 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.038670894487 0.236089414692 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0133373551058 0.076458572812 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0190829398052 0.0737576698707 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0267678439723 0.150856017488 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163319698686 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.