The reading and the lecture both are about a benefits of solar energy. The author of the reading states that advantages of the solar energy is positive and should be supportive for the production. The lecturer builds upon those same ideas to give a more comprehensive picture by providing three reasons.
To begin with, according to the reading, the first benefit of the solar energy is to reduce the consumption of non-renewable source of energy. There is no fear of producing the solar energy. To support this idea, the lecturer goes on to explaining that it can be consider as clean renewable energy. As it has long life span, people should not worry about the production of it. Furthermore, he mentions that it is also non polutant which is the great for environment.
Secondly, the reading assserts that the burning fuel is great source of pollution in the earth; however, solar energy has no any effect of pollution. The lecturer futher illustrates that solar energy can used in multiple ways. If the authority is given to the public, personal will control a energy. This makes the people more responsible for the conservation of energy. Moreover, he mentions that people won't waste energy.
Finally, the writer of the article claims that solar energy is cheap as compare to the the fuel. Once people spend money on it; they sholud not invest for long time. To advocate this idea, the speaker posits that peole can sell the excess energy. Besides, solar energy will become source of income in the family.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a benefit' or simply 'benefits'?
Suggestion: a benefit; benefits
... reading and the lecture both are about a benefits of solar energy. The author of the read...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hould be supportive for the production. The lecturer builds upon those same ideas t...
^^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...in the earth; however, solar energy has no any effect of pollution. The lecturer f...
^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...en to the public, personal will control a energy. This makes the people more resp...
^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...hat solar energy is cheap as compare to the the fuel. Once people spend money on it; th...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...hat solar energy is cheap as compare to the the fuel. Once people spend money on it; th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87596899225 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53487186779 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531007751938 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5878721836 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.0 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1764705882 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 4.33554083885 346% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0336534386398 0.272083759551 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0113014620886 0.0996497079465 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0185434074828 0.0662205650399 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.023083317697 0.162205337803 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170501338085 0.0443174109184 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.3589403974 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.