Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Teachers' attitudes and manners have always been under the scrutiny of societies because they can have a pivotal effect on students’ personalities. Having considered this, many people think that teachers should not talk about their social and political perspectives in the class. On the other hand, others believe that teachers should not be impeded from expressing their personal views about social and political issues. I, personally, concur with the latter group for two conspicuous reasons that I will elaborate upon hereunder.
To begin with, in the sophisticated today’s world where we live, parents are preoccupied with a hectic life. Parents do not have enough time to talk about crucial matters such as social and political matters. In this situation, children will be deprived of gaining information and knowledge in this area. Therefore, if teachers talk about such subjects in the class, students give a chance of being familiar with different concepts about society and politics. To elucidate on, while being a student at school, I did not spend enough time with my parents to talk about the things above my personal life. However, Thanks to my literature teacher, which always was talking about important social and political objects, I got a profound understanding of the occurrences in my country and in the world.

Second, although it is highly probable that, teachers talking about personal viewpoints related to social events and political attitudes, make mistakes, they can encourage students to critically thinking and develop their intellectual abilities. Teachers who talk about their viewpoints, provide the class with a vast variety of discussions. In this circumstance, students urge to declare their own ideas and opinions which leads to reaching the ability to evaluate the pros and cons of different aspects of a given object efficiently. In the class mentioned in the former paragraph, I always thought about the discussions and tried to make a rational conclusion. As a result, I learned how to evaluate different aspects of potential questions and find the best answer.

Having the two aforementioned reasons into account, I do believe that teachers should not be banned to talk about their personal points of view related to social and political matters. In my opinion, not only can teachers make students familiar with social and political issues, but they also can improve the intellectual abilities of students to a great extent.

Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 379, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'declaring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: declaring
...ns. In this circumstance, students urge to declare their own ideas and opinions which lead...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, such as, talking about, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2085.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33248081841 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82714796484 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526854219949 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3784123714 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.647058824 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23529411765 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244608740641 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881076949333 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576058654916 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183584695704 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612228601823 0.0645574589148 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.