Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teacher plays an important role for conveying knowledge to students, which helps students to solid their professional background. However, if a teacher make his or her social or political views known to students in the classroom, it will inevitably have some negative effects to students. Thus, I agree with the statement that teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
To begin with, if teachers make their political views known to students, it may create conflicts between teachers and students who have different political views. Since most people would not be able to be calm when they talk about politics, so conflicts usually happen between people whose political positions are opposite. For example, in Taiwan, there was a protest that happened in 2014, protesters were protesting about the government. I remember a lot of students joined the protest in that year, and some of protesters started a campaign that encouraged students to take classes whose teachers are in favor of the government.
Furthermore, teachers who like to share their political views tend to distract students in the class. Because sometime those views are irrelevant to the class that a teacher is teaching, so student would usually use that time to do things other than listening to teacher. For instance, I took Spanish class when I was in university. I tried really hard to learn this language in the class, but at the end of semester, I felt that I did not learn that much in the class. Since my Spanish teacher spent more than half of the semester talking about politics in Taiwan, so most of students used those time to swipe phones.
Last but not the least, I believe that politics should not get into the schools, and teachers should play a neutral role for teaching students. In this way, students can focus more on gaining knowledge, rather than talking about politics all the time. Let's take my Spanish teacher as example, I think she does have strong academic background, but talking too much about politics in the class made a lot of students lost their passion in Spanish, including me.
In conclusion, I believe that if teachers do not make their social or political views known to students, students can learn more efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the protesters') or simply say ''some protesters''.
Suggestion: some of the protesters; some protesters
...ts joined the protest in that year, and some of protesters started a campaign that encouraged stud...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the students') or simply say ''most students''.
Suggestion: most of the students; most students
...er talking about politics in Taiwan, so most of students used those time to swipe phones. Las...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...an talking about politics all the time. Lets take my Spanish teacher as example, I t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, talking about, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99214659686 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61292346643 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484293193717 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5207704687 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.1875 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333333492715 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140091633156 0.076458572812 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144720735481 0.0737576698707 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229926405452 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106378614927 0.0645574589148 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.