Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
To me, being successful in a future job requires not only the ability to relate well to people, but also professional knowledge, and hard working etc. Therefore, I disagree with the statement that the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Instead, I believe that they are equally important.
To begin with, it is true that one of important factors that brings us to success in a future job is the ability to relate well to people. Since most of job positions require us to collaborate with our coworkers, and if we can not achieve it, the performance of the team may not be able to reach the supervisor's expectation. For example, I remember when I used to work as a research assistant, my boss asked me and my colleague, Tom, to analyze the data of one of his research, and present the result to him. Because it was a little bit difficult to do it, he wanted us to collaborate. However, Tom thought that he had better statistical skill than me, so he decided to ignore my opinion. As a result, the professor was not satisfied to the analysis, since we used the wrong statistic method to analyze it. And it turned out that my idea was correct. This case indicates the importance of the ability to relate well to people.
However, studying hard is imperative as well. Since it allows us to have stronger professional background, and be able to apply our professions better. For instance, a lot of interviews of software engineer position require applicants to perform professional skills, such as writing code or coming out with the most efficient algorithm. All of these skills need us to study hard when we are still students, since they are harder to acquire when we are not students.
Moreover, studying hard in school can also let us develop hard working habit. Since we have gotten used to study hard, it would be easier for us to work harder in a position. For example, because I have developed the habit of studying hard, when my coworkers are complaining about heavy workload, I instead felt it was nothing. At the end, I won more bonus because of my hard working.
To conclude, despite the ability to relate well to people is important, without studying hard in the school, it is still unlikely for a person to be successful in a job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'supervisors'' or 'supervisor's'?
Suggestion: supervisors'; supervisor's
...f the team may not be able to reach the supervisors expectation. For example, I remember wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ent the result to him. Because it was a little bit difficult to do it, he wanted us to col...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65110565111 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70730231791 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4914004914 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6400042882 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.65 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.35 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316391580974 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109027339304 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123937130212 0.0737576698707 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219264571521 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117061179494 0.0645574589148 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.