Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
It is not a secret the ability to think and take a position about various matters in life is in human nature. As far as I am concerned, I agree that it is not becoming for teachers to share their social and political viewpoints with the students. I will elaborate on my reasons in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the main responsibility of teachers is to nurture students and guide them to be capable of critical thinking, which will help them to firm their own opinions in different areas in life. In addition, students are in a state of their lives that their emotions could compromise their judgments. On the other hand, teachers play a moment role in their cognitions. If teachers only share their point of view without considering this sensitive point, they might plant ideas inside students’ minds. Therefore, it is crucial for students first to be familiar with the tenets of rational thinking and analyzing the facts, and then derive conclusions and make statements about political or social issues. For example, when I was in high school, I passionately was following the animal rights campaigns. I was confident that it is an essential subject matter for me because my biology teacher has thought us first to find the roots of a notion, and then go for its claims. We learned this rule through a class assignment in which, we had to investigate the principles of Darwin’s Evolution Theory, and express what we thought about it. After finishing high school, I found out that my teacher did not believe in the campaign I have been following back then, but he fully championed my actions for it. That is why the teacher should not make public opinions about ongoing social or political subjects.
Moreover, announcing views that teachers possess might cause an interruption in their class. Consider a situation in which the teacher has an aberrant viewpoint on a political issue, and the majority of his class are against him. Not only is this conflict irrelevant to the class, but also it is unnecessarily unpleasant. Students will not respect their teacher and consequently, not learn anything that year. Recent research illustrates that 75% of classes that their teacher did not involve his personal opinion in his work, rich higher final grades at end of the semester. This conspicuously shows the importance of keeping teachers’ sights to themselves.
In conclusion, I maintain that educators should not share their beliefs in class because it prevents students from independent critical thinking and might cause problems in their work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1406, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t ongoing social or political subjects. Moreover, announcing views that teachers...
^^^
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
... that their teacher did not involve his personal opinion in his work, rich higher final grades a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and might cause problems in their work.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.018735363 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79343492649 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545667447307 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9824382743 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.15 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.35 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30645843981 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922392369374 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703138661666 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176640454454 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533306969785 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.