Knowledge is the greatest treasure one can own. It cannot be stolen by thieves, it cannot be destroyed by floods. However, knowledge can be corrupted and the only one that can do that is the teacher who gives you the knowledge. In my view, the primary way to corrupt this is by the personal social, and political views of the teacher. Therefore, I firmly believe that teacher should not state their social, political view in the classroom. In subsequent paragraphs, this will be explained in detail.
First of all, the teacher should present facts objectively. If their subjective views related to politics or society get exposed during a session it might present a biased view on the subject being discussed. As responsible teachers, it is their obligation to show both sides of the coin and let the students decide what is best for them. For instance, when I was at the university our political science teacher was an active member of a political party, and most of his teaching was influenced by his views. However, in the middle of the semester professor retired from university to participate more actively in politics, and our semester-end exams were marked by a different professor who had the opposite political view. As a result, most of the students got very low marks on the exam, the lowest marks were related to the areas taught by the previous professor.
Another point is that if a teacher's view is not parallel with the view of some students. And this might result in developing unpleasant feelings towards both the teacher and the subject. For example, at high school, most of my friends choose music as an elective subject and most of them had inherent talents in music. However, our music teacher most of the time lectures about her view on some problems in society, her objective was not to influence us but to make the class more interesting by allowing little digress from monotonous subject matters. Unfortunately, some talented students, who had contrasting opinions changed the subject after growing unpleasant feelings towards the teacher. Some of the students were members of the school music group.
Some may argue that it might be good to be open and honest with the students. In my opinion, the best way to be honest with the students is to avoid presenting personal views on controversial matters, especially if they are related to social and political views. If you are able to present all the sides of an issue and let the student decide what is good for them that is the best way to be open with the students.
To sum, without a shadow of a doubt, it is my firm belief that presenting a personal social and political view in the classroom can ruin the learning experience. Most often presenting facts objectively can attract good hearts and the attentions of students and parents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 697, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...npleasant feelings towards the teacher. Some of the students were members of the school mus...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... of the school music group. Some may argue that it might be good to be open and ho...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2344.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85300207039 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67544976678 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463768115942 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5123669415 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.913043478 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.39130434783 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212174063457 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693937985864 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660748256776 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122528916228 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340318126314 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.