Homo Sapiens prefer to work in groups. To the success of the human civilization groups working skills have a significant contribution. However, some hold contrasting view about working in groups, specially at high school, and universities projects. Although several considerations and concerns are exist, I firmly believe that the advantage of group working outweigh the disadvantages. In what follows, I will elaborate on my reasons and explain on what rationale my perspective is based on.
First of all, in a group project same problem is analyzed by several people. This give many creative ideas and different ways the same goal can be achieved. Furthermore, through discussions we can reduce the chances of making an incorrect decision. Final result is, more complete and creative project. For instance, when I was at the university we need to create a software system for a rest house. The professor gave the flexibility to either work in group of two or work individually and students who work individually were given additional time to complete the project. Final results showed that students who worked in groups got higher marks and from the feedbacks we got to know that those systems were more creative and had addressed many practical issues.
Secondly, working in groups improve team working skills. These skills are highly demanded in the practical world. Working in a team require patience and respect to others' opinions. To develop these skills, group projects at universities and high schools plays a vital role, because it is much easier to train young mind than a matured one. In the real world, specially in government and political field we see a myriad of conflicts among politicians. These occurs as a result of lack of experience in working as a group. If we can teach these skills to budding youths at educational institutes we would be able to avoid many conflicts that we experience today.
However, others analyze this issue from a different view and argue that it is unfair to give same grade to every student. Their complain is that this method gives higher grades to lazy students, even though they do not have a significant contribution. In my opinion that happens only if you follow a wrong path in group works. The sole purpose of a group project is to work as a united team. The team leader should encourage all the students to actively participate in the project and should guide them if they struggles to catch up. This way we will able to justify the score we get as a team. Receiving non uniform scores might discourage students and it might hinder their education.
To sum up, I firmly believe that it is important to student to work as a group and every member should receive same grade. It is the responsibility of the whole group to encourage every one to actively participate in the project. And to encourage and promote group work it is vital and fair to give every member same grade.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...several considerations and concerns are exist, I firmly believe that the advantage of...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se it is much easier to train young mind than a matured one. In the real world, s...
^^
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ck of experience in working as a group. If we can teach these skills to budding yo...
^^
Line 7, column 512, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'struggle'
Suggestion: struggle
...e project and should guide them if they struggles to catch up. This way we will able to j...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d fair to give every member same grade.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2445.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90963855422 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73880639454 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512048192771 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 770.4 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2794505275 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3103448276 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1724137931 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31034482759 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446780088167 0.236089414692 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113503056252 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977788015776 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255587154772 0.150856017488 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119301400294 0.0645574589148 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.