Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is undeniable that teachers play a crucial role in our lives. This is because they facilitate our learning and improve our knowledge. In my opinion, teachers should not reveal their political views to their students. I feel this way for the following reasons, which will be explored in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, teachers can mislead the students into voting or advertising for candidates that are not their choice. Evidently, teachers have a great influence on their students. Some might see it as opportunity to get something from the teacher, maybe an extra mark or some other forms of awards. For example, during my secondary school years, my Physic teacher, Mr. John Kent, was a member of People Democratic party(PDP), a political party in Nigeria. He normally talked about the party in the class, their views and how they are willing to rule Nigeria and reduce the crime rates and unemployment in the country. During the presidential election in 2015, he supported Mr. Musa Abubakar, who was the party candidate for the election. He encourage the students to post Mr. Musa's picture on their social media platform to encourage people to vote for him. The student did as he said, and eventually Mr. Musa Abubakar won the election. After four years of ruling Nigeria, things went from bad to worse. As a result of this people, people don't want to associate with Mr. John Kent, because they believed he deceived them to voting the wrong person. This examples clearly shows why teachers should not expose their political views to the students.
Secondly, in revealing their political/social views to students might encourage people to do something that is illegal. Students see their teachers as role models and therefore, will do whatever their teachers said. Drawing from my own personal experience. Several years ago in Nigeria, a lecturer at University of Aba made a statement, that people that steals or involves in arm robbery should be killed immediately. To him, their punishment is death and there was no need to consult the court. This goes in contrary to what is done in the country. Many people in the class took this message in and started practicing it. Some even told their friends about it. Consequently, many people were killed without the consultation of the legal system. This angered the members of the public because some of those people killed were actually innocent. The government in an attempt to resolve this issue, decided to put punishment on anyone found in such an act. For this reason, teachers should keep their social views to themselves.
In conclusion, I believe teachers should not reveal their political or social views to the students. Not only that it will discourage the students from voting their choice, it could cause them to do things that are prohibited in the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 740, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'encourages'.
Suggestion: encourages
...he party candidate for the election. He encourage the students to post Mr. Musas picture ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1018, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... went from bad to worse. As a result of this people, people dont want to associate w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1038, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rse. As a result of this people, people dont want to associate with Mr. John Kent, b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2367.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99367088608 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63156966381 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502109704641 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7501838635 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6206896552 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3448275862 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.79310344828 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247113478564 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735065916059 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834532552432 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1726781541 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316551274477 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.