Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid
according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support
your opinion.
Some people believe that teachers has not enough abilities to teach something for their students. In this reason they think if teachers earn their salary according to students learn or not, It will more benefcial for students. Beacuse teachers give more attention who is really paid by students in terms of learn their lessons or not. On the contrast, other people believe that teachers could not be evaluation by their students learn or not. As teachers usually focus on learn something for their students which is related with their lessons. In my opinion, a teacher could not judge by their student learning or not. In this definition, I disagree with this statement and I am going to explain why ı am thinking in that way with three different reasons.
Firstly teachers usually do their job beacuse of they really like their job. In the other words, if some a person had interested in make money, he or she would never choosed teacher as a job. In this case teachers make their job beacuse they want to that job. I believe that most of teachers defend to teach something has great value and they supported it is never evaluate with money. For example, when I was a student at high school my math teacher could work for big company but he had choosed work for school even he was be able to earn high amonut of money. However he has a purpose.His purpose is learn math for next generation and this generation will be great in terms of math skills.
Secondly, if teachers are taken their money by students learning cabilities or their efforts, It is not fair. For example, when I was a student university, I had great professor and he had been giving Political Science and İnternational Relations lesson. He had great knowledge about that subject. Moreover, he has great abilities to learn his lesson but almost everyone had low result of his exam. Evatually it is any other reason why teachers could not jugde with their students learn something or not.
Finally, if teachers only evaluate with their students learning, they will always give high score from their lesson exams. And it is getting worst beacuse of that reason. Although student can not learn something, they take their money. In the result, both of side are effectted badly by in this circumstance.
All in all I strongly disagree with this statement beacuse of these reasons.
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 3
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Modern technology is creating a single world culture. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that way with three different reasons. Firstly teachers usually do their job be...
^^
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the teachers') or simply say ''most teachers''.
Suggestion: most of the teachers; most teachers
...e they want to that job. I believe that most of teachers defend to teach something has great val...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to teach something has great value and they supported it is never evaluate with...
^^
Line 2, column 368, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'evaluated'.
Suggestion: evaluated
...t value and they supported it is never evaluate with money. For example, when I was a s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 440, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., when I was a student at high school my math teacher could work for big company ...
^^
Line 2, column 529, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...had choosed work for school even he was be able to earn high amonut of money. Howe...
^^
Line 2, column 567, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...s be able to earn high amonut of money. However he has a purpose.His purpose is learn m...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 592, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: His
...onut of money. However he has a purpose.His purpose is learn math for next generati...
^^^
Line 2, column 607, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'learned', 'learnt'.
Suggestion: learned; learnt
...However he has a purpose.His purpose is learn math for next generation and this gener...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d great professor and he had been giving Political Science and İnternational Rela...
^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...abilities to learn his lesson but almost everyone had low result of his exam. Eva...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77886977887 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45721620692 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437346437346 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1382881501 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5652173913 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6956521739 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73913043478 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284829698736 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104767214222 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688944683703 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175701179849 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692168212985 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.