Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how well their students perform.
Nowadays, in the wake of intense competition in education, the issue that how to determine the teacher’s salary has been a hot-debated one. There are many principles and forms have been proposed, with many people taking attitude that teachers should be paid according to how well their students perform. As far as I am concerned, if I was the decision maker, I would be favor of this proposal.
Admittedly, it is understandable that this proposal may yield a counterproductive result for not only the children but also the teacher. To illustrate, this may press the teachers too hard to lose confidence to their teaching method and have negative effects on the competition between them. One the one hand, some teachers may be unwilling to teach classes with low-level students. One the other hand, the teaches may ignore their students’ inner voice and psychological conditions, with most attention on improving their grades and correcting their behaviors in school.
Nevertheless, just because the teachers will concentrate more on the students’ behavior does not mean this will pose a threat to caring about students’ inner views and thoughts. What is known to us all is that the behavior is the mirror of one’s mind. If a student behaves badly, it is more possible that there must be something wrong with his mental world. To improve his behavior, teachers must interact with him, listening to his inner voice. When putting in others’ shoes, can the teachers find out the real problems plaguing their kids and dealing with they from the root. Imagine such a scene, if a student is always stealing money, on no account should the teacher ignore such thing on the grounds that he is paid according to the students’ behavior. After finding that the student’s family is very indigent and parents have little time to accompany with him, and the teacher will relieve him, give him more warmth and prevent him from going to the wrong direction of his life.
In addition, in spite of some deficiencies, this proposal is still considerably conducive to the teachers and their students. Salary is the key determinant of the principle that judges the teachers’ teaching ability, and to some extent, it plays a pivotal role in stimulating them. If a teacher is encouraged by the salary according to his students’ behavior, he will acknowledge that every single one drop of his sweat pays back. Then he will be committed to the education career more industriously, thus he will be equipped with advanced education approaches, changing the traditional teacher-centered condition. On the contrary, if a teacher’s salary is determined by others aspects instead of their own students’ behavior such as the time of their career or how many essays they publicized, his brain will be stuffed with those elements rather than the students.
Based on the above discussion, I can safely draw a conclusion that it is sensible to pay the teachers according to the students’ behaviors. In opposition to the ideas that it may be detrimental to both teachers and students, this proposal can promote the teaching method and give a rise to the care for students.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, then, thus, well, in addition, such as, in spite of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2693.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 523.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14913957935 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08191786705 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499043977055 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 817.2 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1267601782 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.238095238 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9047619048 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287551671519 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968590616372 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775629827075 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183643619014 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653458374001 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.