Nowadays, the issue of how to determine the teacher’s salary has been a hot-debated one. Hence, it is imperative for governments to find solutions to this issue. There have already been many diversified principles and forms so far, with many people taking the attitude that teachers should be paid according to how well their students perform. As far as I am concerned, if I were the decision maker, I would definitely render my support to implement this proposal.
Admittedly, it is understandable that some people concern this proposal may yield some counterproductive results. This may press the teachers too hard to lose confidence in their teaching method and have adverse effects on the competition between them. One the one hand, some teachers may be unwilling to teach classes with more low-level students. On the other hand, the teaches may ignore their students’ inner voice and psychological conditions, with most attention on their grades and behaviors in school, which incur a loss of belief.
However, students will receive more attention from their teachers because of this motion. Behavior is the mirror of one’s mind. To improve students’ behavior, teachers must propose two-side communication with them. Only putting in others’ shoes, can the teachers find out the real problems plaguing their kids and dealing with them from the root. When a more student-based learning atmosphere created due to the implementation of the proposal, teachers will attach greater importance to the individuality of their students, so as to instruct them more effectively. Imagine such a scene, if a student is always stealing money, on no account should the teacher ignore such thing on the grounds that he is paid according to the students’ behavior. After finding that the student’s family is very needy and parents have little time to accompany with him, the teacher will give him more warmth and prevent him from going to the wrong direction of life, which will make the student more active in study and correct wrong behavior.
In addition, this proposal will considerably urge them to enhance their teaching efficiency. Usually, salary is the crucial determinant of stimulus that improves the quality of one’s work. When teachers are encouraged according to his students’ behavior, he will acknowledge that every single drop of his sweat can pay back. Such outcomes reflect positively upon teachers. They will be committed to the education career more industriously, equipped with advanced education approaches. However, if a teacher’s salary is determined by others aspects instead of their students’ behavior such as the time of their work or how many essays they publicized, his brain will be stuffed with those elements rather than the students, which even contributes to the exhaustion.
In sum, I can safely draw a conclusion that it is sensible to pay the teachers according to the students’ behaviors. In opposition to the ideas that it may be detrimental to both teachers and students, this proposal can promote the teaching method and give rise to the care for students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...to the individuality of their students, so as to instruct them more effectively. Imagine...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, well, as to, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2665.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35140562249 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06710655614 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520080321285 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 809.1 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.045234487 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.869565217 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.652173913 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73913043478 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270650643787 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824386528456 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782546611277 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165099445021 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501192329029 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.