Some countries ban their citizens to talk about the social or political views which they are believed to be the actions of opposing the government while some others allow everyone to discuss and raise up the people opinion. Obviously, even now, the question of should or shouldn't is still debatable. However, I still believe that teachers should make their social or political views known to students in the classroom, in an education environment because of two main reasons.
First, education without teachers' perspective just like repeating machine of knowledge without any practical experience. From my point of view, the teacher is not a device recorded all of the knowledge and transferred it to students. Teachers are those who motivate students to open that device, listen and challenge that knowledge. For example, in a political class, if a teacher only talks about the structure and agrees with all policies of the Government, we don't need a teacher since that information can be found everywhere, books, articles or Internet. What makes students interested in the teacher's lecture, it is his opinion and the way he allows all students to speak out loud their own opinion. Therefore, teachers don't need to hide their views on any topics even social or political.
Second, showing teachers' views of those topics is also helpful to encourage students to raise up their voice and come up with better solutions for social or political problems. For example, I remember that when I was a University Student, I used to have a class named Government Integrity. In this class, we talked about the corruption situation in our country. I still remembered the atmosphere of that class, very enthusiastic and dynamic. All students are excited to join and raise up their voice. Why? I believe that because that topic is very attractive and closely connecting will all people lives. After that class, I really felt that I had to have more responsibilities for the country I live and more courage to talk about my views.
In sum, I strongly believe that educational environment should be a place for free opinion discussion for any topics because it not only helps to learn lessons better by comparing and contrasting many different perspectives but also helps to enhance the critical thinking and courage to raise up students' own opinion which is believed the most important objective of education. Therefore, I think teachers should make their social or political view known and discussed among all students in the classroom.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ly, even now, the question of should or shouldnt is still debatable. However, I still be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...w, the teacher is not a device recorded all of the knowledge and transferred it to student...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...with all policies of the Government, we dont need a teacher since that information c...
^^^^
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... their own opinion. Therefore, teachers dont need to hide their views on any topics ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ons better by comparing and contrasting many different perspectives but also helps to enhance ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, second, so, still, therefore, thus, while, even so, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10602409639 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77503123842 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503614457831 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.7899321474 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.722222222 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0555555556 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251280275777 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900797345949 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990450095919 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172111003209 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472651978041 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.