Talking about social or political issues is an ordinary activity in many societies. However, some people believe that it should be banned for teachers to reveal their viewpoints about these types of topics in the classrooms. Others cast doubt on that and claim that it is not a big deal for students to get their teachers’ perspectives. I completely agree with the first group and support my idea in the following.
To begin with, getting information from what teachers’ beliefs is may face students in a dilemma. It is because individuals are growing up in different conditions, and consequently, their viewpoints vary from each other. In this situation, maybe students get stuck in the contrast between what their parents show them about a particular fact on society and what their teacher says. Since often both of these individuals are categorized as loyalty and trustful people in children’s minds, it faces them with a crucial dilemma that which viewpoint is correct. Therefore, if teachers interfere and illustrate their perspectives about social or political views, they not only put students in a contradiction, but also put parents into troubles.
Moreover, talking about social or political aspects is different from the purpose of teaching. These types of extra information are not vital for students and may distract their attention in the classrooms. In an ordinary situation, students’ minds are wandering easily. These data not only cause students to get distracted more easily, but also do not have any benefit for them to better learn the lesson. One of my memories can shed some light on this subject. When I was an eight-year-old girl, my teacher talked about the negative impacts of not wearing a hijab in my future life. As she wanted to continue her subject, I could not focus on the course, for the only subject I was thinking about was her advice about wearing a hijab.
In conclusion, there are several remarkable reasons to be persuasive enough that teachers should not reveal their social or political perspectives for students because it not only may be different from what their parents tell them, but also is not the purpose of teaching.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, talking about, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12813370474 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89997965237 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512534818942 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.877082352 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.294117647 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191596990555 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667941417842 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440451361661 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13930113979 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410749082359 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.