Nowadays, as the world is rapidly changing to be more internet-based, some people claim that the applicability of printed books and articles has declined in research areas, for most people incline to use the internet type. I completely agree with this idea and support my viewpoint with the two conspicuous reasons in the following essay.
To begin with, using cloud data is more beneficial because it is accessible almost everywhere. People neither have to move it from one place to another nor have to store heavy books, which definitely not only fill a considerable vacant area, but also make the reader confused. My own experience can be a compelling example of this notion. I was engaged in the role of researcher in one of the well-known universities in Iran. Once I went to a faraway countryside and I decided to study in the traditional form, without using the Internet information. Therefore, I took some relevant printed articles, which posed several problems. Firstly, they took a lot of space in the car that put me and my family in an uncomfortable position during the way. Secondly, I could not find the particular data I was searching for, because I did not know how to find even a rudimentary keyword in a thirty-five-page article.
Moreover, online articles and books are more comprehensive than the printed ones. It is a fact obvious that individuals only can provide restricted resources as a printed form, while, people can search on the internet in a wide variety to find the proper concept. Moreover, as often newly published books or accepted articles get available on the internet, the number of back issues will remarkably increment. Therefore, researchers can easily enjoy the abundance of both information and choice to find the specific research gap they investigate for.
In conclusion, there are several vital reasons which are persuasive enough to prove that cloud books or article are more useable than the printed types. It is because of the fact that the internet accessibility is superior to the printed form. Additionally, in comparison with the printed data, the cloud types are more comprehensive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 909, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... keyword in a thirty-five-page article. Moreover, online articles and books are ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...e useable than the printed types. It is because of the fact that the internet accessibility is superior ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0821529745 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99780968495 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56657223796 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0705544933 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.529411765 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242067949756 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717533464955 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054567167885 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154965144897 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589930439318 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.