do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should show their political and social view to students.
Teachers play a significant role in students' personality. They make an important contribution to the formation of students' attitudes toward life. This matter whether teachers had better say their mindsets to students or not is a controversial issue among individuals. Some people believe that teachers should not express their social and political beliefs, and I totally agree with this idea. I feel this way, for two main reasons that I will explain in the following essay.
To begin with, speaking about political and social subjects diverts students' attention away from their lessons. Students cannot concentrate on their studying, therefore they cannot perform properly on the exams. For example, when I was in high school, I had a teacher who her focus was on political and social issues. She always spoke about her point of view toward the current circumstance in society and argued with students about political and social topics. These debates distracted me from my lessons and I could not learn any effective lesson in her class. Consequently, I took a bad score at the end of the semester.
Additionally, those teachers who talk about their political and social viewpoint in the class do not give an opportunity for students to make a decision about these topics. Students are not mature enough to distinguish between wrong and right, and they will accept the teachers’ attitudes toward political and social subjects without any understanding about them. For instance, I had a teacher who was unsatisfied about the government’s policy toward teachers. She always showed her disagreement with the government. Therefore, many students were in contrast with the government regardless of any knowledge about the government’s principles. It is axiomatic that students’ belief will be changed by teachers explanation about different topics.
All in all, by considering the mentioned reasons above, I think that teachers should not show their beliefs about political and social issues in the class. This is because of the fact that It reduces the students’ attention to their lessons, and also it takes the chance from students to have their thoughts about social and political matters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 719, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...tudents' belief will be changed by teachers explanation about different topics. A...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...and social issues in the class. This is because of the fact that It reduces the students' attention...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in contrast, speaking about, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36103151862 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99861627681 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521489971347 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4414011281 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4736842105 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270607092793 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904245674676 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779069548886 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186243513966 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274643383269 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.