Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teaching is the most respectful job among all jobs human-created. No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of teachers of today and teachers of the past. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely disagree with the statement that states that teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than now for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, no other profession can beat the teaching profession when we talk about the appreciation and value of a job. Teachers are all-time respected persons in a society. They are the maker of humanity. We can not disrespect them whatever society or era we live in. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. You see, one year ago I went to my high school to see my teachers. Two of my friends were also with me and we went there to show some respect to our teachers because they deeply influenced our life. My favorite teacher was my math teacher, he taught me something else other than math and these teachings were really beneficial to me to develop my career. As a result, I showed deep respect to him. For this reason, the teacher never can be disrespected by any human in whatever society or era he lives in.
Secondly, there is a great reason to respect our teachers nowadays. The teachers of today are more skilled because of the new teaching materials and methods of teachings. From drawing my own experience, my university teacher, named Md Shumon Mia, is an MIT Ph.D. and he has some unique skills like providing senses of humor, sensing of feelings of what students think besides his high academic knowledge. He does research about the class before taking it. He uses a projector to show the lessons more visually and more efficiently. Moreover, he has good communication skill as well as leadership. It is certainly clear to see why teachers should be appreciated and valued now as they were valued in past.
In light of the above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that teachers are appreciated now as much as they were appreciated in past because of their motivations and socialization on youngs as well as modern teachers are now more skilled.
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 58
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 697, Rule ID: IN_PAST
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ated and valued now as they were valued in past. In light of the above-mentioned re...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, well, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76973468246 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532828282828 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0934950343 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5714285714 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90476190476 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278700513725 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785308971664 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853680964378 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194248303269 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051630464558 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.