Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were before?
Nowadays, technology plays a major role in people lives, and children are not the exception which means the technology affects their lives and their attitudes in many different ways. Some people argue that technology cause children to lose their creativity. However, others, as I do, hold the opposite view. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, technology conduct children to think deeply by providing them with some problems and technical challenges, which mean children should improve their skills in order to accomplish them. Thanks to the technology todays, children can use different applications which are designed to teach them tactfully. Such programs are created by some expert educators who know what can cause a child to flourish the creativity. Not only that, but it causes children to be more curious about real-world problems by facing them with some realistic circumstances. My own experience is a compelling example of this, my little sister has a tablet which such programs are installed on. She had struggle with some mathematic problems but after working with a specific application related to math for children. She now is able to solve many mathematic problems in some brilliant ways. The application not only makes my sister more creative and astute but gives her more incentive to study.
Secondly, technology provides children with more opportunities for learning, and educating can open children eyes to the facts about their abilities. By using the positive aspects of technologies such as the internet children can have a unique opportunity to interact with their tutors. In todays’ world, teachers are able to communicate with children by using of social media, which is a cost-efficient way to conduct children. For example, my brother is a high school teacher, he always designs some questions related to his courses and provide them for the children on his Facebook page. By using the internet and its countless advantages my brother's students have more chances to improve their skills. Had the technology was not available my brother could not have educated his student effectively and the children could not have improved their creativity.
In conclusion, I am totally in support of the technology and its positive effect on children creativity. This is because the technology provides children with some programs in which they are able to boost their skills and because it could be a unique advantage for children to learn effectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ects their lives and their attitudes in many different ways. Some people argue that technology...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i feel, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22794117647 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8133486374 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495098039216 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9040807628 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.65 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179698392588 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645982907455 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432430804402 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128950137515 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180079341908 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.