Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

From a general view, in the current state of affairs we observe, it is conspicuously clear that television advertising can make some positive or negative impacts on young children. Nowadays, one of the most important parts of our life occupies by watching television, which happens to young children, too. Thus, controlling the impacts of this event done by parents who should look at their children after. Depending on personal experience, personality type, and emotional concerns, people differ greatly in their attitudes towards this question what are the impacts of the television advertisement over their young children? A host of people from one camp are in the conviction that negative effects are more than positive. Their supposition is at odds with the conception of some others belonging to another camp embracing the view that their young children learn more elements when watching television advertising. If I want to choose between these options, I would take a side that young children should not be allowed to watch TV advertising. I think this way because of two the main reasons which will be discussed in the following essay. The first one is that due to the advertising attractiveness, the children won't pass any time for watching the broadcast and the second one is young children don’t know about which foods may good or bad; therefore, it may motivate them to buy a dangerous feed such as chips, ice-cream, and so on; however, children don’t have enough knowledge about that. Also, In support of this argument, we should note that watching broadcast develop fallacy power in their mind. However, careful scrutiny of the evidence reveals that it provides little credible support for our conclusion.

First of all, I strongly believe that passing children’s time watching television advertisements cannot make amends. They can play with their friends, parents teach them some basic knowledge about alphabets, numbers and so on. Therefore, I apparently reject this statement which the young children can watch TV advertisement.

Another reason which should not go unnoticed is the knowledge of children about what’s healthy or unhealthy is low. Some foods which advertise on the television have worse effects on children’s health. When they watch TV, absorb with colorful and attractive advertisements and may want to buy some unhealthy foods.

In order to fully evaluate this argument, we need to have a significant amount of additional clue before accepting or refusing it completely. The first piece of clue we need to know more, then analyze, is advertising impacts on children’s fantasy. Power in imagination attend people in another world. This skill gage in some jobs such as artwork and architecture; therefore, someone who occupies in these works affects not only over the power of fantasy but also the creative mind.
To put all into the nutshell, considering the aforementioned points, I firmly believe that it is more rational to negative impacts on the young child’s mind. I suggest several reasons for holding this view, so since not only have effects on free daily time, but also have effects on children’s health In the final analysis, the writer’s recommendation cannot be taken to be true because, as it was shown in the body paragraphs above, it depends on a number of questions each of which should be answered. The recommendation can only be accepted if the mentioned statement already referred to are all implied appropriately.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng children can watch TV advertisement. Another reason which should not go unnot...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, then, therefore, thus, i think, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2965.0 1977.66487455 150% => OK
No of words: 562.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27580071174 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86893614481 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99365313094 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 907.2 618.680645161 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.9298536715 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.541666667 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95833333333 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1963014265 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060866269591 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037453129189 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110043507392 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533292363987 0.0645574589148 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.