In Current era, Television is an integral part of society. It has become the tool to relax and spend time with family. Television has taken the place of what Newspaper, Magazines and Comics used to hold. I believe advertisements targeted towards younger children should not be allowed for various reasons.
First, Younger children are not mature enough for these advertisements. They watch TV for animations and effects. The advertisement companies make benefit of this by advertising the same toy and promising the animations. This advertising leads to urge in kids to buy the toy and the parents getting repeatedly tortured to buy that. The kids are not experienced enough to understand what is best for them, thus the Television authority should not allow these type of advertisements.
Second, these advertisements are affecting the relationship by converting toys into a meter to compare parent's love. Toy are the most important things for kids. However, sometimes they might become the measure to count love for kids. Usually, Father is the one who works and is more susceptible to buy the toy. This will make the child believe that the mother does not love him as she does not buy him the toy. So this will affect their relations with the parents either Father or the Mother.
Third, the advertisements are making kid stubborn. If the parents do not buy the toy or game from the commercial for the kid, they will keep annoying them by crying, shouting. The parents eventually have to satisfy the kids need to calm them. This behavior in the long term leads to stubbornness.
Overall, the advertisements targetted towards young kids are doing more harm than good, so they should not be allowed to be telecasted between the kid's show.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...re not experienced enough to understand whats best for them, thus the Television auth...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 283.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02826855124 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82578601692 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56183745583 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8524124249 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.8947368421 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8947368421 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.78947368421 5.45110844103 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138695758582 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434796501697 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469627229204 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094127252111 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620593837159 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.