In recent years, there has been considerable discussion about how to develop children’s potentials. This has led to the suggestion that parents should encourage their children to acquire a wide variety of knowledge such as mathematics, technology and music and arrange some outdoor activities for their kids. In addition to concentrating upon academic studies and school-related activities, these parents also think it important to allow children to engage in whatever they feel interested in. From my perspective, this open-minded idea is desirable despite some manageable demerits.
Irrefutably, there are several disadvantages of giving children individual autonomy over time. One of the potential downsides is that children are not mature enough to know what they want, nor are they able to perfectly arrange their schedule. There has been evidence that children with unconstrained freedom are more likely to risk doing something illegal such as taking drug and browsing pornographic websites. Nonetheless, there is little likelihood of these happenings given the fact that the benefits of this trend far outweigh its drawbacks.
In fact, children are able to foster a sense of responsibility if trained to schedule their daily routines. For example, children who juggle homework with entertainment have to draw a timetable to complete both of them. If they only bury themselves in playing video games, their time for doing assignments would be greatly reduced. It is apparent that they could not get their duties done punctually, and that they would be reprimanded for their negligence. However, they would get a valuable lesson from this negative experience, being aware that they should be accountable for unfinished tasks.
Another benefit of providing children with some independence is that they have opportunities to explore their future possibilities. Only when children have private time to deal with what they like can they understand their capability and identify their weakness, and Canada is a good example. Aside from academic studies and extracurricular activities, secondary schools in Canada provide students with a three-hour self-study session per week in which they are motivated to discover what they like or lack. Students who expect to become tech-savvy experts can make use of time to research how to solve the problems of computer viruses. Others practice sketching portraits if they want to be painters. And still others that are not enthusiastic about academic studies are able to participate in some hands-on activities such as carpentry and paper-cutting.
To recapitulate, some people might take issue with my standpoint because they are uncertain whether children could organize their daily lives orderly. Nevertheless, children are able to become more responsible and realize their strengths and limitations if they are properly trained to prioritize their own things. Hence, the idea of sparing children more flexible time to do whatever they want should be promoted.
- Nowadays as women and men have to work full time household duties should be equally divided Do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays in many countries woman have full time jobs therefore it is logical to share household task evenly between man and woman To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 89
- Nowadays in many countries woman have full time jobs. therefore, it is logical to share household task evenly between man and woman. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. 84
- Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every way Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop 95
- ONLINE LEARNING IS GOOD AS FACE TO FACE LEARNING DO YOU AGREE 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, still, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2486.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57399103139 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04389188469 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558295964126 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2758253923 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.086956522 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3913043478 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86956521739 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315224716986 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889776301774 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721061098559 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184463332664 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042043023979 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.