Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
The word "work" has born with civilization and how to do it has been the most controversial issue around it. In today's modern era, there are some opinions that doing works quickly with such mistakes is more acceptable rather than having work done slowly but correctly. In contrast, my confirm opinion is that doing our job at a lower speedy rate but with accuracy have more outweigh beneficial for the two most rational reasons which have been pinpointed in the following passages.
The first significant point to clarify my standpoint is that the amount of time we spend to have work done is critically important. In fact, if we do our job slowly but with accuracy to have no mistake, we can save more time. In other words, doing our works at a speedy rate with plenty of errors is just a waste of time since we have to go over it even sometimes at the beginning. My own experience as an example to opt for this reason is that two years ago I was working at a company as a landscape designer. One time, I tried to do a project quickly to prove myself whereas, due to the large number of errors I had made, I had to do it again that cost me much more time than usual, and could not make the deadline. Had I never hurried at doing the project at a speedy rate, I could have done the project by deadline time and no waste of time.
The second remarkable point to clear cut my outlook is that having done work precisely makes us more trustable in our boss's eyes and get promotion easier. To be more specific, there is no use in working quickly with lots of errors because we put our trustworthiness in danger. Actually, no one is willing to cooperate with us since, mainly, everyone expects us to have huge mistakes in the work and they cannot trust our work. My coworker, for example, is a man doing jobs quickly but his mistakes made him an untrustworthy person to do specifically such a vital part of works even last year he demoted. If he did not make a huge number of errors in his previous works, he would be a trustable person to have works done by him and get a promotion.
To wrap up what has been discussed, in my point of view working at a lower speed is far better because we will not waste our time through going over and over on mistakes which potentially are unavoidable if we work quickly. Besides, having jobs done precisely for the first time leads to being the one who everyone can count on our work.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, if, look, second, so, whereas, even so, for example, in contrast, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.3642384106 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51054818995 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472406181015 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.2370666583 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5625 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3125 20.6045352989 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261992449716 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106322058918 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670537221053 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179840257224 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629646151557 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.