Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
In today's hectic world, people have spent most of their daily hours accomplishing their given tasks at the workplace. People are always seeking a way to cope with a large number of tasks to meet the deadline. In this regard, two strategies are suggested by many specialists. The first one is that do the tasks quickly without worry about the accurateness. On the other hand, another strategy has suggested people work slowly to make sure that every task is doing correctly. The controversial question that arises in this regard is which one of these strategies is better. while some inclined toward the first strategy, I am of the opinion that the advantages of the second strategy far out weight the first one. In the following paragraph, I will delve into the reasons and examples justifying my point of view.
The first reason that comes to my mind is that by doing the task more accurately in a longer period of time than hastily, employees can utilize the benefits of rewards. Nowadays, employers tend to assess their employees' performances according to their perfectness of tasks not the volume of work that has done with a lot of mistakes. Therefore, applying this strategy increases the chance of getting a promotion and raise in the near future. My experience is a compelling example of this. In my first job, as I was naive and do not have enough experience, I used to do given tasks as swift as possible to do more work. However, the result of my work usually had a negative influence on my manager. As a result of this way, I was replaced by an accurate staff. If I had done the task more accurately, I would not have dismissed by my employer.
The second noteworthy reason is that doing the task hastily might have an adverse effect that influences not only the company of corporation that people work but also the society and world. For instance, if the medical researcher does not their task inaccurate way, definitely, the result of work might have a detrimental effect on the health section. If the staffs of a company are not careful with their data, the result without any doubt would be mistaken.
From what has been discussed above, I personally believe doing the task slowly but accurately not only consequence a great benefit for employees but also prevent from some big mistakes. As a result, the second strategy that I choose to elaborate on might be the better choice to accomplish the tasks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e are always seeking a way to cope with a large number of tasks to meet the deadline. In this reg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 573, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...hich one of these strategies is better. while some inclined toward the first strategy...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ng the task more accurately in a longer period of time than hastily, employees can utilize the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73933649289 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65652810519 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0338858736 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2380952381 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0952380952 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165428748705 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474150056184 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054313155601 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934642260399 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371474790694 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.