Do you agree or disagree with the following statement？In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, an increasing number of people tend to consider it true that working quickly and risking making mistakes are more critical than working slowly and ensuring everything is right. But in my perspective, the latter one is more efficient, for time and money are not going to be wasted by finishing work at the first try.
With the development of city, the living rhythm is progressively faster, as same as the demanding working speed. Whereas, especially for some occupations, working fast but making many mistakes can cause worse influence, for example, bank staffs. Although it is a trend to use online paying technique, there is also a large amount of people who need to go to bank in person for services of loans or credit cards. So a massive population can still be seen going in or out through the bank. Undoubtedly, bank staffs are demanded to work quickly to satisfy the customers. However, considering of the substantial amount of money managing by them, if these staffs made a mistake, maybe just a point, the customers would bear a huge loss. And definitely this would lead to people's failure in confidence of the bank as well. The bank may be required to compensate the money and the staff may be fired. And obviously, the process to solve issues is certainly time-consuming and exhausting. Hence, if I were the bank manager, I would rather employers work not so fast and ensure making as less mistakes as possible. Through this, both loss in money and waste of time will be avoided.
However, it is true that some occupations need to work promptly, such as fast food restaurants waiters or waitresses, since customers aren't able to endure waiting peculiarly when they are rushing to meet their own customers. Besides, if waiters or waitresses are so slow that food become cold, it disappoints consumers, too. But unpractised and urgent, waiters or waitresses may drop the plates on the ground, it will waste the time of consumers and the money of shop owners. Therefore, doing work meticulously is always better.
In brief, working slowly and meticulously does more good than working quickly but carelessly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 766, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...loss. And definitely this would lead to peoples failure in confidence of the bank as we...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1079, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...s work not so fast and ensure making as less mistakes as possible. Through this, bot...
^^^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
... waiters or waitresses, since customers arent able to endure waiting peculiarly when ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, for example, in brief, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93593314763 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75677090977 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559888579387 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3522904263 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27777777778 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208015949626 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677671742269 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879624228329 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166354920337 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890247823973 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.