Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is critically important that employees do their best to be prosperous in their jobs. Personally, I believe that it is essential for people working slowly and making sure everything is correct. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, working gradually and ensuring that there is no mistake leads people saving their time and energy. If we work quickly, it may cause us to some mistakes requiring us to solve them. As a result, it takes some extra time and energy for us to solve these likely mistakes. On the other hand, if we carefully perform our tasks, we minimize the probable problems. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. When I was a senior student, I was assigned a group project in a programming course. We were a group of five, in which everyone had to write a particular part of a code. Although each of us had to write his own code, but the codes later had to combined so that we could get the final outputs. Having considered this, one of our project members unconsciously made a mistake leading our team to get the wrong outputs. Consequently, we were required to investigate who and how the mistake was occurred, which took many times and energy from us. Based on this experience, I strongly believe that performing our tasks carefully and slowly is of the great importance.
Furthermore, it is vital for employees to work carefully and slowly because it results in the high-quality performance and effectiveness. In today’s sophisticated and progressive world, with the development of technology, people seek to buy products with high quality. It leads market to be extremely competitive making companies to presents their products at a very fast time and high quality as well. As a case in point, there is a body of companies-consumers relationship research that I read recently. The researchers conducted an interview with consumers from several specified companies to ascertain what is the most significant factor when they consider to buy a product. The aim of the study was to find out whether people prefer to buy new versions of products, in this case smartphones, as soon as possible but with the risk of existence of likely flaws or not. The statistics showed that the preference for more than 90 percent of the participants was quality and not the time. By and large, this finding can at least partly explain why working carefully and slowly but with the minimum mistake and flaw is of critical importance for individuals.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that working gradually and carefully is more indispensable than working rapidly and danger making mistakes. Not only it saves our time and energy but also it makes the results more effective with high quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider buying'.
Suggestion: consider buying
...s the most significant factor when they consider to buy a product. The aim of the study was to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 872, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...sk of existence of likely flaws or not. The statistics showed that the preference f...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, so, well, as to, at least, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, by and large, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2309.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88160676533 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94032989928 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526427061311 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8654942253 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2083333333 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7083333333 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205870479559 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576002820884 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068179874297 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153983047596 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626857881772 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.