Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Most people in the world think that the number of cars is growing tremendously in the last two decades relatively, probably because people, nowadays, are more sophisticated and stylish and have more desire to show up to others. I, however, disagree with this idea because of several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, last two decades, burgeoned modern technology in an advanced way, people were more lured by sophisticated things because new thing attracts anyone to use them. Decades ago, cars were a more fascinating thing to people as the car was the new thing at that time and many people want to use it. For example, psychologists suggest that people are more interested to do new things and after prolog use of that things. they neglect those things. Therefore, the present people desire to use new things rather than cars for transportation such as metro-rail, public vehicles, etc.
Second, the public vehicles were more concerning cars, and in the last twenty years, the government provides disparate facilities to the public. For example, different central and local governments facilitate transportation services for the citizens like the city rail, monorail, and public buses. In addition, there are lots of other facilities given by government: meal, snacks, and other food items. Moreover, being used of advanced technologies in modern public vehicles, such as CCTV for secure travel, fascinating seats, and led coaches for relaxation and comfortability, people are swift to use not private cars.
Third, being aware more and more concerning the health and lifestyle of people, they are more interested to use other form of treansportation that keeps and maintain the body healty and fit, because rapid growth of physical inactivity and hastiness in daily life induce different kinds of non communicable diseases like diabetes, high blood pressure, cardiovascular syndrom, etc. Due to public awarness, most people want to use cycle to go their work place instead of using vehicles.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that the number of cars decreasing continuously in last twenty years. This is beacause the people do not want to use old things and government is going to change the policies to swift to use the public vehicles rather than private cars, and public awarness to use cycle for health benefit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an advanced way" with adverb for "advanced"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...wo decades, burgeoned modern technology in an advanced way, people were more lured by sophisticate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...gs and after prolog use of that things. they neglect those things. Therefore, the pr...
^^^^
Line 8, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c vehicles rather than private cars, and public awarness to use cycle for health ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20209973753 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78945458745 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522309711286 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.8514778273 48.9658058833 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.133333333 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173673817655 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656446072598 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490639471739 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10658977768 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386987135727 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.