Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? universities should require students to take history courses no matter it is their fields of study or not.
The main purpose of students to attend universities is preparing for their dream job by acquiring enough knowledge in their interest field of study. While some people hold the idea that students should be obligated to pass courses related to history no matter it is their field of study or not, personally, it is my firm conviction that there is no point in taking history courses by students who do not study history. In the ensuing lines, I will elaborate on my standpoint through conspicuous reasons.
The first worthwhile mentioning reason is that taking history courses by students who do not study history is just a waste of both time and money not only for students but also for universities. In fact, students will have to pay more tuition fees and universities have to hire more professors to teach history courses, also it takes more time to graduate for students. My university's discipline of history courses as an instance is an apt illustration of this. The university where I was studying made an obligation that all students without attention to their field of study must take at least one course of history. Consequently, they built more classes and hire more professors of history to cover all classes that cost a huge amount of money for the university that was suffering from budget shorting. Besides, students were paying much money as well, which raised loads of complaints by students regarding history courses that the university after two years gave up that obligation and eliminated that from required courses. As a result, it was just wasting time and money for both students and universities.
The second significant point that should be pinpointed to champion my stance is that when students are forced to take part in courses which are not relevant to their field of study, they not going to pay attention as should be in the classes and they just looking for a passing grade. My personal experience of having history courses as an undergraduate education is a compelling clarification on this. Four years before now, I was studying landscape design that had to pass some courses related to history. Not only I but also all other my classmates did not participate in discussions that made those courses really boring that we wanted to just pass them by minimum grades to be graduated. Therefore, it could be concluded that forcing students to take history courses when it is not their field of study, do not de fruitful and students do not pay attention like other courses of their field of study.
To wrap up what has been discussed, I reckon that students should not be inquired to participate in history classes which is not their field of study. This is because not only would it be an absolute waste of time and money for both students and universities, but also students do not take those courses seriously, even it affects their performance on other courses.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, if, look, really, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, while, at least, i reckon, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2406.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87044534413 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70683124154 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.425101214575 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 751.5 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3641626424 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.529411765 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0588235294 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58823529412 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379508418272 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139131141584 0.076458572812 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101176611318 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27299992466 0.150856017488 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604884266522 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.