Teamwork has always been a crucial skill in human life. A controversial argument that is often raised among people is whether the communications need to be in person or they can happen easily by e-mails and other similar protocols. While some people may believe that using e-mails can provide a result with higher quality, some other think that it is necessary for people to have eye-to-eye contact and the presence of teammates can play a role. If I were obliged to take sides, I would think that communication in person would result in a project with higher quality than using e-mails. I have several reasons for my opinion, on some of which I will elaborate subsequently.
First of all, direct communication helps in teammates better understading each other. Hardly can anyone deny the impact of body language in talking. If teammates understand each other better, the synergy created in the team affects the overall quality of the project. I believe my opinion is somehow biased my own experience. You see, I once had a project for a university course, in which we had to develop a software. I and my teammate always planned to meet on a pre-planned date and started to work on the project together. Guess what? We were the first team to finish that project and we also got the highest score possible. As you can see, I believe talking to each other helps in delivering better projects. the professor refutes with this and says
Second, being able to talk directly with your teammates instead of using e-mails can reduce the communication delay significantly. When using e-mails, the time you get your answer is non-deterministic, your teammate may not check his e-mails regularly, and if you have a deadline, you will be in huge trouble. For example, I once participated in a contest with two of my friends. The problem was that I could not be present at the exact date of contest since I had gone home to see my family. We ended up working on the contest while talking in a group chat. What happened was that we could not synchronize ourselves and did not know what others were doing, so we could not solve the problem and it was one of my biggest failures as a keen contestant. It should be clear now how important direct communication is when it comes to doing projects with a deadline ahead.
I resist the temptation to explain more, hoping there is enough information already. As the reasons suggest, I believe that communicating in person is more beneficial than through e-mail. Because not only it helps in better understanding the teammates, but also it reduces the delay of communication. I suggest everyone try to have direct contact with their teammates when doing a group project.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 716, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...er helps in delivering better projects. the professor refutes with this and says ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, while, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80085653105 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8111448208 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503211991435 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4787699925 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4166666667 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4583333333 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95833333333 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271058801641 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688186733119 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05817760711 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163900593721 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228281807913 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.