Most people agree that everyone should communicate through e-mail with their peers to discuss their project. So, whenever there is a misconception there would be evidence of who said what. Personally, I would definitely choose to communicate in person. It is my firm belief that it is more efficient and clear to discuss such things in person for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, face-to-face communication is more in-depth and practical. Especially, when it comes to working on a project together. It provides an opportunity to brainstorm ideas on the spot and have a clear understanding of what to do next. On top of these duties, waiting for an e-mail is suffocating as we have to wait for the other person's opinion. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. When I was working on an art project with my peers, we barely made time to meet up in person to consult about the roles. As a result, we ended up communicating through text and did not finish our homework by the deadline. If we had strictly gathered in a coffee shop, face to face, and were crystal clear about the duties, we would have done a great job. Hence, human interaction in person is definitely essential to producing better work.
Moreover, as technologies are advancing day by day, it is crucial to keep human interaction alive. Communicating through e-mail will not only be a long process, but it will end up causing people to be more distant from one another.
It is certainly clear to see why it is better to interact in person for a project. In light of the reasons mentioned, I strongly believe that real human interaction is key to creating high-quality work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , whenever” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...h their peers to discuss their project. So, whenever there is a misconception there would be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...cating as we have to wait for the other persons opinion. I have to admit that my opinio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 309.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76051779935 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89070865373 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559870550162 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0692421155 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5294117647 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29411764706 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247916042349 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793316540238 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609369856703 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137957918584 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452654262433 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.