This topic is concerned about which factor is more important in succeeding, hard work or luck. I believe hard work is more accountable for what people have achieved, but I do not think that luck has anything to do with the success. Therefore, I disagree with the presented statement. I will explore specific reasons in detail in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, luck is not sufficient to achieve a goal. I am a university student, and I have to take tests on numerous occasions. When I do not study very hard, it is undeniably impossible to pass the exam, no matter how hard I pray. However, it may be the case that I have the slightest hope of passing the exam if I have the luck, provided that I am on the brink of passing it or failing it. My experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a sophomore, I had to take an algebra exam. I had not prepared for it until the previous day, which is why I had to spend the whole night putting theories in memory. I was half giving up, so all I could do after the test was pray. At length it was really fortunate that I could pass it. I assumed it was contributed by the luck. Drawing from this experience, luck has something to do with the success.
Another reason I argue luck is involved in the success is that the environment is always changing. Personally, I play the violin and I have had some experience of participating in the competitions. When I am entrapped in the gigantic hall and sieged by the totally silent audience, I get overwhelmed by the whole atmosphere. When those circumstances get over me, I sometimes lose consciousness, which ruins the following performance. It is regrettable, but I believe whether I faint or not depends on the luck because it happened however hard I had practiced before. After all, this example demonstrates how people's performance is dependent on the environment, which means they need luck to accomplish a perfect performance.
These two reasons support my viewpoint. In other words, it is not an exaggeration to state that luck has very much to do with success. Therefore I disagree with the presented statement.
- Holidays honor people or events If you could create a new holiday what person or event would it honor and how would you want people to celebrate it Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- kouryaku
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'prayed'.
Suggestion: prayed
...p, so all I could do after the test was pray. At length it was really fortunate tha...
^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... luck has very much to do with success. Therefore I disagree with the presented statement...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, after all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64456233422 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95027710156 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509283819629 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3337155943 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.9583333333 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7083333333 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319396534789 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866203765835 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813201921084 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221287672283 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940384713596 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.