Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp
Doing group projects in universities and schools become more common nowadays. There is a belief that group members help each other, and the process of learning gets more comfortable. Some people assume that it will provide an extraordinary situation that makes educating a happier process and motivate students to try harder. There are many advantages to be a part of a team, but I think individual projects are far better than group ones. There are many reasons for this claim, which two of them that have great importance elaborate hereunder.
To begin with, group projects gather different level students; some know a lot and learn faster, and the others know a few, and they need more time to understand the subject. As a result, the better ones do the whole project and do not let the rest of the group try. They believe they do all responsible better and can't trust others. In the end, the rest of the group has only a gesture of project, and their skills won't improve. For example, in my case, when I was a student, one of my teammates consider herself only, and if we do any part of the project, she did not use our works. After a while, we lost our eagerness and didn't participate in the project, and we only read the whole report. So, we could not learn and get in trouble later.
Moreover, by doing projects individually, the students have enough time to spend on all aspects of the project and learn deeper. In ideal groups that everyone does their jobs as well as they can, group members focus on their responses, and because of the limited time, they can't use that time to share their research entirely with the other members and just reported what they need in the project. So, everyone knows a few a whole, and it is not really efficient. For instance, I thoroughly learned every project that I did on my own and motivated me to learn more after the project even. In contrast, after a group project always had some misunderstanding points.
To sum up, in my view, a group project is not as efficient as it seems, because if a member in a group is in a high level, will not let the other members grow and learn, and individual projects have less content and more time to be done and everyone can search completely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ieve they do all responsible better and cant trust others. In the end, the rest of t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 626, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...fter a while, we lost our eagerness and didnt participate in the project, and we only...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
..., and because of the limited time, they cant use that time to share their research e...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, really, so, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in contrast, as a result, as well as, in my view, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54094292804 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48293252277 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511166253102 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8539285279 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3888888889 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236622490678 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802900450034 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465040210026 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151581027482 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460722732133 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.