Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Without a shadow of a doubt, working on projects as an assignment is has a pivotal role on what students learn. However, an unanswered question in this area is a student learns more effectively whether in the group projects or projects conducted by himself. Despite the arguments asserting that working alone on projects opens effectively new windows of knowledge, I believe otherwise, maintaining that projects are accomplished in a group brings about a large treasure of information in an effective manner. There are two significant reasons as to why I hold this point of view.
First and foremost, the crux of the matter lies in the fact that having projects supposed to accomplish with others fosters the creativity of every member. To be more specific, since every learner has different thinking caps, each student of the group comes up with a different solution for each problem and issues faced during the projects. It means that all members can acquaint with many points of view related t the projects and broaden their horizons. Therefore, it makes it more possible for them to cultivate their creativity due to the brainstorming done on the projects. However, one learns no others' perspective when he works alone on the projects. As a result, he does not have much less chance to be a creative person in the future.
Another prominent motive to be stipulated is that working in the group teaches not only how to be a creative and effective person but also much more important lessons of life. To delineate, although being in the group seems hard at first for students, eventually it cultivates a group spirit that plays a vital role in their future life and job. I mean they will learn how to behave as a member of the group having the same goal, how to oppose others' opinions, many but enough, when students work in a group at their schools or universities. Nothing is more important than these skills that are just taught in the educational institutes. On the other hand, projects conducted by only one leaner just teach superficial lessons that never bring benefits in the future as much as group projects.
Reflecting upon all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that working in a group learns important lessons effectively. It is highly recommended to conduct research to gain insight into students' perspective about this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 486, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective manner" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s about a large treasure of information in an effective manner. There are two significant reasons as t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 604, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...on the projects. However, one learns no others perspective when he works alone on the ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, as to, i mean, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97222222222 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7695228581 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.423580096 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.823529412 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2941176471 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284374659014 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917412352112 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07161839471 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171216643872 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069599436664 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.