It is critically important that teachers assist their students in learning in effective ways. Assigning projects help students in different ways. Someones like doing projects solitary, on the opposite side, others prefer to be in a group in order to accomplish the projects. When it comes to me, I believe that cooperation teaches students more valuable skills than working alone. In what follows, I will elaborate on my viewpoint.
To begin with, students increase the quantity and quality of learning by working together. To be more specific, a group can learn more topics than an individual. In addition, the members share their knowledge efficiently by asking and answering with each other. When a person is working alone, they can read one article in a day, for example; maybe several problems and misunderstandings emerge during studying time. However, by doing a project together, the number of papers rise in numbers. Besides, the members could learn usefully by challenging and correcting themselves. Perhaps my personal experience may shed more light on this matter. Three years ago, I took a Rehabilitation course for my Bachelor's degree. As a project, we should read a massive book about motor control in that class. I joined a four-member-group, so we divided every chapter into four sections, and everyone must read it at a particular time. Although the book's content was hard to understand, we talked together after reading our section, so it worked for us to finish the book successfully with the entire understanding.
Secondly, the needed software could be taught by one of the students in the group in less time. If the project desires special software, it is not easy, and it takes a long time to learn it. However, when a person knows about the software, it will be pleasant to share their ability with others. For example, I needed to learn ADAMS for my master's project, and I did not know it a little. Finally, My professor advised me to call Ali, he was one of our research group members, for teaching this software. He spent two days with me, and it was efficient. After that, I finish my project as well as I wish.
In conclusion, with all taken into account, I strongly think that the projects which need students to work in groups are more effective. This is because students can learn more and in-depth. In addition, they contribute their abilities to each other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is critically important that teachers...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ws, I will elaborate on my viewpoint. To begin with, students increase the qua...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssfully with the entire understanding. Secondly, the needed software could be t...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I finish my project as well as I wish. In conclusion, with all taken into accou...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93564356436 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82191679373 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554455445545 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1046395504 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.6923076923 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5384615385 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19230769231 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308972556276 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823101159984 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643471959384 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210483329772 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630094010869 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.