In today's complicated and interconnected world we live in, teamwork has a vital role in the progress and development of students for their future careers. Some people believe that working alone on assignments and projects is more effective than working as a team. I, personally, on the other hand, think that projects done by team members is more efficient and better than those done by a single person. I feel this way for two significant reasons which I will explain in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, when students work on an assignment as a team, they can learn from each other because everyone knows something others may not have any clue about. Also, team members can help each other to finish the project on time or even earlier when compared to projects done by an individual. As a result, the assignment can be done more efficiently and more easily than when one person works on the same task alone. My personal example is a good illustration of this concept. Three years ago, when I was studying in university, we had a professor who gave us a teamwork task to do. Because we were four students to work on a task given by the educator, we divided the work to four different parts according to the experience or knowledge everyone had in that field. Therefore, we finished the task on time and as easy as possible. Nonetheless, my friend who worked alone on the same task, had some problems in some sections of the assignment leading her not to complete the task like us. Had she not worked alone, she could have done the assignment more efficiently and conveniently than when she did so by herself. So, this example shows how it is far better and easier to work as a team on a project giving rise to more effective work compared to those who work on the same task by himself or herself.
Last but not least, when pupils do tasks assigned by their teacher in a team, they socialize with members of the group which leads to learn how to communicate well with every person and leads to better communication in their personal and occupational relationships in the long run. Also, they have a good chance to make friends which can last forever. In this way, hence, students can deliver high quality projects, while learning social skills which can help them more in the years to come. For instance, my cousin's professor assigned them a task to execute with his friends. Finally, he did the project very well with the help of his friends and got a great mark on that course, at the same time made some good relationships which lasted for a longer period of time. If he had worked on the project by himself, he could not have done the assignment more efficiently and simultaneously have not acquainted with some of his best friends he has now.
To put it all in a nutshell, taking all the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I am of opinion that teamwork can lead to higher quality works than tasks done by a single student. Not only do they learn from each member of the group and aid each other, but also they can develop their social skills and make great friendships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 754, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...relationships which lasted for a longer period of time. If he had worked on the project by him...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, i feel, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2561.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 554.0 407.700716846 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62274368231 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85151570047 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60215006286 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447653429603 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.9 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.1303834887 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.409090909 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344710599879 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104495327163 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730507179364 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21550390753 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060393578805 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.