Both the reading and the lecture talk about Spartacus fighting against Roman's army. The former mentions three reasons why he is a fascinating hero. The professor, on the other hand, casts doubt on the idea by explaining that it is true that Spartacus was a real person who fought against Roman, but it is historically accurate aspects the text holds. Accordingly, she attacks each of three reasons given in the reading as follows.
First of all, both the author and the professor posit his goal as returning to home. The author explains that Spartacus' main goal was to come back home taken by Romans. The lecture, in contrast, rejects the idea by pointing out that this was not his real aim. According to her, when Spartacus defeated the Roman, he could escape and go home. But, instead, he marched toward them to take revenge and also become wealthy individual, not the goal the article addresses.
Second of all, both the article and the speaker put forth whether he was a military genius person or not. The writer suggests that Spartacus was a military brilliant man due to relatively small and bad-equipped army he had, nonetheless conquered Roman army. The speaker, conversely, rebuts this by saying that Roman Empire didn't take him seriously at first. She adds that when the Romans sent their best army to fight Spartacus and his men, they defeated them which shows he was not a genius.
Third, both the writer and the lecturer put forward whether he wished to liberate all Roman slaves or not. The passage avers that one of his goals was to liberate slaves and despite getting an offer from Roman to be a Roman senator, he refused it, for the goal he pursued. The lecture, however, refutes this by explaining that this is not backed by evidence. She continues to say that it goes back to 18th century European who their thinkers and writers wanted an inspiration hero from ancient time as antislavery one, introducing Spartacus. As a result, this that he wanted to free all slaves of Roman, is an inspiration story not historically correct.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...rebuts this by saying that Roman Empire didnt take him seriously at first. She adds t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d them which shows he was not a genius. Third, both the writer and the lecturer ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, conversely, first, however, nonetheless, second, so, third, as to, in contrast, as a result, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 22.412803532 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 354.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79943502825 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49257091456 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 145.348785872 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533898305085 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.250837157 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3888888889 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307155858478 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971380913153 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862418630627 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189314275358 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455376462709 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.