Spartacus: the rebel leader who fought against the Romans with an army of fellow escaped slaves, is one of the most famous figures in ancient Roman history. Spartacus led his men against their Roman oppressors and managed to defeat the Roman army in several battles. Eventually Spartacus and his army were defeated and put to death. To this day，Spartacus fascinates both historians and the general public. Several aspects about his story have made him a particularly appealing hero.
Firs，Spartacus‘ original goal in his conflict against Rome is one everyone can empathize with-he wanted to return home Spartacus and his men had been taken by the Romans from faraway lands In fighting the Romans, Spartacus and his men initially sought to return to the homelands from which they had been uprooted Spartacus and his men's desire to return home is one we can all appreciate.
Second, Spartacus' initial success in fighting against the powerful Roman army has earned him the admiration people feel when someone who is overmatched triumphs through sheer skill. Spartacus and his men formed a relatively small, ill-equipped army; the Roman army? in contrast, was large, well-financed, and highly trained. Spartacus' ability to seriously trouble the Romans on the battlefield testifies to his military brilliance, making him a hero in most people's eyes.
Third, in fighting against Rome: Spartacus sought to liberate all Roman slaves and thus commanded respect as an early human rights advocate. Before his final battle with the Romans, Spartacus was sent an offer by a Roman general: if Spartacus would stop fighting, he would be made a Roman senator, a member of Rome's powerful elite: and his men would be freed. However, Spartacus rejected this offer because it would have left the institution of slavery in place.
The article states that Spartacus, an ancient Roman hero, fought against the Roman and his action fascinates both the public and historian for several reasons. It supports this idea by three. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that many of the stories behind the Spartacus are not accurate, and this essay is upon those untrue stories. Then, she rebuts all the reasons mentioned in the article.
First, the author claims the first attitude which mesmerize people is that Spartacus wanted to return to his homeland, something we appreciate. However, the professor challenges this notion by explaining that Spartacus attempted to concur the roman cities and actually his army and he had several chances to come back to their home, but they headed to cities to gain wealth and especially gold from those Roman cities.
Second, the reading asserts that initial successes of his small and ill-equipped army against very strong and large Roman’s army, which based on military genius, is inspirational and admirable for all of us. Conversely, the speaker disagrees with this reasoning and adds that the first success happened because the Romans did not take them seriously. When the Roman’s best soldiers attack them, they defeated easily and soon. Hence this theory could not be enumerate for this reason.
Third, the article avers that Spartacus liberated all the slaves and we consider this action as a human right attitude and an invaluable virtue. Controversially, the professor posits that historical evidence does not support this story. She mentions that we know who and when this fake story invented in the history. It comes back to 18 century, when the anti-slavery movement needed an inspirational hero, one who wanted to propagate this movement wrote a story about Spartacus and assigned many of this anti-slavery attributes to him.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ck them, they defeated easily and soon. Hence this theory could not be enumerate for ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 338, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...ted in the history. It comes back to 18 century, when the anti-slavery movement needed ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, first, hence, however, second, so, then, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21140939597 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60362248642 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5871697159 49.2860985944 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.928571429 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280076825391 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862817474556 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987725487507 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17602685118 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616627652134 0.0443174109184 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.