Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more
effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Homework, the basic part of each student's school life, triggers heated discussions over whether students learn more effectively when they finish it together. Individual homework, in some people's view, is superior to group projects. On the contrary, my perspective is that students will definitely learn better when dealing with group assignments together for the following reasons.
To begin with, never should we ignore that when completing group projects, students will learn more knowledge within less time, compared with finishing it individually. In details, within certain amount of time, students who work collaboratively will acquire more information and expertise. For example, in order to cope with the projects, students may go to the library to read some relative books, or search for some background facts or useful information on the internet. This process will definitely cost a plethora of time when students finish it by themselves alone. However, with group members who shoulder some burdens, each individual in this group is only required to do a certain part of the aformentioned tasks, after which they can share the information they gathered. As a result, during this process, each member merely allocates less time but gets considerable knowledge from others. However, students, undoubtedly, will spend much more time obtaining the same amount of expertise if they work alone. What's more, since each student has his own different advantages and disadvantages, group project serves as a platform for students to learn from each other. For example, by communicating with other members, not only can students consolidate the academic proficiencies that they are not familiar with, but also they are able to learn practical skills such as writing skills.
In addition, what should be emphasized is that when working as a group, students will get a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of the knowledge they learned. To be more specific, when confronting problems, group members could discuss together, during which they will learn from different perspectives and are consequently more likely to solve that problem. In contrast, it is impossible for a student who addresses the issue alone to come up with such numerous ideas. Besides, team projects reduce the risk of committing mistakes. For example, group members, proposing different ideas or even criticism, distract people from their original thinking mode or wrong comprehension. However, if a student only completes the project independently, he may get stuck in his stereotyped thinking mode, and thus find it arduous to have a right understanding of a certain concept.
In conclusion, it is sensible for instructors to assign group projects because during this course students will learn more efficiently and deeper.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'discussions'' or 'discussion's'?
Suggestion: discussions'; discussion's
...h students school life, triggers heated discussions over whether students learn more effect...
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... is that students will definitely learn better when dealing with group assignments tog...
Line 3, column 1018, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...amount of expertise if they work alone. Whats more, since each student has his own di...
Line 3, column 1100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
... different advantages and disadvantages, group project serves as a platform for s...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2377.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47695852535 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93767235699 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529953917051 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 4.94265232975 324% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5641441966 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.105263158 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8421052632 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84210526316 5.45110844103 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335761031041 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112213244111 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672093473212 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226863372515 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369984194677 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.