Your friend is going to reduce the living expenses. Which of the following way would
you recommend to your friend and why?
1. Find a roommate that can share the living expenses.
2. Buy the new technology products less frequently.
3. Shop for less expensive food to cook at home.
reducing living expenses, one of the most common goal of each family, is always being valued and triggered heated discussion on which is the effective way to save money. Finding a roommate to share house rent and life expenses, or buying new technology produces less frequently, in some people's view, are much better ways. Contrary to these opinion is my perspective that the best solution is shopping for less expensive food and cook at home.
To begin with, shopping for less expensive food will considerably decrease the daily cost by purchasing discounted foods and fostering the habit of thrift. Firstly, as we need to consume a certain amount of food every day, with cheap food bought, we can save more money compared with other approaches. To be more specific, the cheap food, most of which is almost expired, is preferred by fewer people, thus can be found frequently. if we buy this kind of food frequently, we can keep our budget tight. What's more, never should we ignore the positive effect of buying cheap food, which might be neglected by people. purchasing cheap food regularly could increase the awareness of saving money in other consumption. For instance, once we adapt to the life of consuming cheap food, we incline to reduce expenses in other aspect of life, such as clothing or entertainment. However, this kind of habit can not be fostered when people only decrease the frequency of buying technology devices, which is still very expensive.
What is equally significant is that cook at home, a healty and meaningful activity in daily life, will also help decline the living costs. By cooking at home, we can save the money we spend in the resturants a lot. going to the resturants to have meal together with friends, regular in everyone's life, will cost a great amount of money because we have to pay for the service in the way of tips to the waiters. By cooking at home, we can save the money for these increased cost. At the same time, we will also save the cost of transportaion to the resturant. What's more, by cooking at home, people will become more healthy since they can control the ingredient in the food, instead of depending on the cook in the resturant. we can make more healthy food for ourselves and keep a balanced diet, reducing the possibility of obesity and heart disease. Besides, the less people eat in the resturant, the less risk people will take to get sick. Therefore, cooking at home could lower the frequent of going to the hospital, reducing life expenses potentially. this can not be achieved by just sharing expenses with roommates.
In conclusion, living expenses, a significance element in people's life, can be effectively decreased if we can shop for less expensive food and cook at home due to the positive impact on thrift and healthy habit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Reducing
reducing living expenses, one of the most common...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this opinion' or 'these opinions'?
Suggestion: this opinion; these opinions
...view, are much better ways. Contrary to these opinion is my perspective that the best solutio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 433, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...r people, thus can be found frequently. if we buy this kind of food frequently, we...
^^
Line 4, column 503, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...equently, we can keep our budget tight. Whats more, never should we ignore the positi...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 616, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Purchasing
...od, which might be neglected by people. purchasing cheap food regularly could increase the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 216, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Going
...money we spend in the resturants a lot. going to the resturants to have meal together...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 559, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...cost of transportaion to the resturant. Whats more, by cooking at home, people will b...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 614, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cooking at home, people will become more healthy since they can control the ingre...
^^
Line 9, column 726, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...depending on the cook in the resturant. we can make more healthy food for ourselve...
^^
Line 9, column 864, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...obesity and heart disease. Besides, the less people eat in the resturant, the less r...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1056, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...al, reducing life expenses potentially. this can not be achieved by just sharing exp...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2347.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86929460581 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59487175912 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477178423237 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 724.5 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7396490935 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.681818182 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244279230367 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859143419116 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584057694699 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19387382034 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503094840039 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.