Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Tasks, the foundation of everyone's life, has been valued and triggers heated discussion over whether people do few things well as they are busy doing assorted different things. Different tasks, in some people's view, can be accomplished well simultaneously . On the contrary, my perspective is that multi-task will lead to less concentration as well as low efficiency, and thus people only do few tasks well.
To begin with, never should we ignore that dealing with multiple tasks at the same time will definitely lead to the distraction of attention on all the assignments. First, the time spent on each task is decreased tremendously since people have to do different things. Obviously, people only have 24 hours per day and each task requires a certain time to finish. When doing various assignments, people have to distribute the limited time to many tasks, leading to less time allocated to each task. As a result, people can not finish the jobs that require a longer time to get done. However, if people only cope with one job at the same time, they will have enough time to accomplish it well. Even if there are some accidents that make the task arduous than though, people can handle it well if they only need to do one thing. Similarly, people's energy is also limited, so only few things can be done well in a short period of time. As people are burdened with so many things, they will feel very exhausted if they have finished some of them. Under such circumstances, hardly can these people have enough passion and energy to deal with following assignments, causing the tasks finished in low quality.
In addition, apart from the limitation of resource people can distribute to the tasks, the low efficiency also contributes to the result that people do few things well. It is well acknowledged that people's overall productivity will be undermined when handling different things. When performing multi-task processing, people will switch from different tasks from time to time, and thus they have to spend extra time recalling the context of each task. For example, if a student writes a paper in the morning, then he attends some volunteer work in the afternoon, he will find it laborious to remember the word he wrote when he goes bask to his paper. What's more, he may also make some mistakes due to the switch of tasks. It is possible that he can not finish this paper on time or do a bad job. However, if he focuses on this paper for a long time, he is able to submit this paper on time and do a very good job.
In conclusion, people can accomplish few tasks well due to the fact that they have assorted jobs to get done at the same time. Only when people only focus on one task can they accomplish each of them with high quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... can be accomplished well simultaneously . On the contrary, my perspective is that...
^^
Line 3, column 916, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... few things can be done well in a short period of time. As people are burdened with so many th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the tasks finished in low quality. In addition, apart from the limitation o...
^^^
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...e wrote when he goes bask to his paper. Whats more, he may also make some mistakes du...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, similarly, so, then, thus, well, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2270.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69008264463 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55016124018 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440082644628 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2035396197 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.181818182 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.04545454545 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246535126855 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991419448595 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742779347354 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18489700314 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079089673637 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.