TPO 37 Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Tasks, the foundation of everyone's life, triggers heated discussion over whether people do few things well as they are busy doing assorted things. Different tasks, in some people's view, can be accomplished in satisfying quality simultaneously. On the contrary, my perspective is that multi-task will lead to less concentration as well as low efficiency, preventing people from finishing most tasks well.
To begin with, never should we ignore that dealing with multiple tasks will definitely lead to the distraction of resources on them. First, the time spent on each task is decreased tremendously. To be more specific, people, undoubtedly, only have 24 hours per day and each task requires a certain time to finish. This constraint forces people to distribute the limited time to excessive tasks, making it impossible to complete all the assignments well. However, if people are required to cope with only one task, they will have enough time to accomplish it well. Even if there are some accidents that make the task more arduous than thought, people can still address the problems calmly with sufficient time. Similarly, people's energy is also limited. Specifically, as people are burdened with numerous things, they will definitely feel exhausted after they have finished some of them with high quality. Therefore, hardly can people have equal passion and energy to deal with subsequent assignments, causing the tasks finished in low quality.
In addition, apart from the limitation of resource people can allocate to the tasks, the low efficiency is also a reason for the failure to finish most things well. First, it is well acknowledged that people's overall productivity will be undermined when handling different things. When performing multi-task processing, people will switch from different tasks from time to time, and thus they have to spend extra time recalling the context of each task. Besides, people may also commit some mistakes due to the switch of tasks. Consequently, they will spend more time discovering the error and rectifying it, resulting in low quality of the tasks. For example, if a student prepares for several exams in a day, he will find it laborious to remember the expertise he learned before switching to different subjects. Even worse, he may make many mistakes during this process. As a result, his study efficiency will be decreased, and may fail to pass all the exams. However, if he focuses on just one subject, he will be more likely to pass that exam.
In conclusion, people can accomplish few tasks well due to the fact that they have assorted jobs to get done at the same time. Only when people focus on one task exclusively can they accomplish each of them with high quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the tasks finished in low quality. In addition, apart from the limitation o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, similarly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2294.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13199105145 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73824406718 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498881431767 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.253257464 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7391304348 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4347826087 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21739130435 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162859214401 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553336064504 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612853919719 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126282717598 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616137774916 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.