Your friend is going to reduce the living expenses. Which of the following way would
you recommend to your friend and why?
1. Find a roommate that can share the living expenses.
2. Buy the new technology products less frequently.
3. Shop for less expensive food to cook at home.
reducing the living expenses, the most common goal of each family, is always being valued and triggered heated discussion on which is the effective way to save money. find a roommate to share a house and expenses, or buy new technology produces less frequently, in some people's view, are much better ways. contrary to these opinion is my perspective that the best solution is shop for less expensive food and cook at home.
To begin with, shopping for less expensive food will considerably decrease the daily cost because of the amound of foods that people consume nowadays. As a result, cost down can be achieved if we can consume less expensive but unwholesome food, and buy the expensive healthy food when it is cheap. To be more specific, as our living standard improved, we eat more unwholesome food. these food, delicious and appealing, is more expensive than some other food which might not taste very well. Therefore, if people could buy less expensive junk food, the money could be saved for some other uses. Simultaneously, people will become more healthy since this kind of food is the main cause to obesity and heart disease. In addition, some people may argue that some healthy food, like some vegetables, may also be expensive. this is true, so the best approach to save money is to wait for a discount and purchase this kind of food at the lowest prise. since human need to consume a huge amound of food, the less expensive food we purchase, the more money we will save. On the contrary, it will be less effective if we find a roommate to share expenses since both people has to consume a certain amount of food.
What is equally significant is that cook at home, a healty and meaningful activity in daily life, will also help decline the living costs. By cooking at home, we can save the money we spend in the resturants a lot. Going to the resturants to have meal together with friends, regular in everyone's life, will cost a great amount of money because these resturants will definitely raise the price of food higher than the cost of food ingrediants and labor in order to make profit. By cooking at home, we can save the money for these increased cost. At the same time, we will also save the cost of transportaion to the resturant. What's more, as we need to have meal every day, the frequency is extremely larger than other activities such as buying new technology produces, and thus we can reduce more cost by cooking at home instead of other approaches.
In conclusion, living expenses, the thing that every one wants to reduce, can be effectively decreased if we can shop for less expensive food and cook at home due to the expensive foods and frequency of cooking and having meal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Reducing
reducing the living expenses, the most common go...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Find
...ich is the effective way to save money. find a roommate to share a house and expense...
^^^^
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Contrary
...ome peoples view, are much better ways. contrary to these opinion is my perspective that...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this opinion' or 'these opinions'?
Suggestion: this opinion; these opinions
...view, are much better ways. contrary to these opinion is my perspective that the best solutio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 383, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...improved, we eat more unwholesome food. these food, delicious and appealing, is more ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 383, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...improved, we eat more unwholesome food. these food, delicious and appealing, is more expen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 634, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Simultaneously, people will become more healthy since this kind of food is the m...
^^
Line 4, column 820, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...some vegetables, may also be expensive. this is true, so the best approach to save m...
^^^^
Line 4, column 947, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
... this kind of food at the lowest prise. since human need to consume a huge amound of ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 626, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...cost of transportaion to the resturant. Whats more, as we need to have meal every day...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71966527197 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49842302463 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445606694561 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 717.3 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6792610443 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.8 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27241891782 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105338393099 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798862502764 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210660447277 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847864368356 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.