Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Leadership, the foundation of team working, has been valued and triggers heated discussion over whether it comes naturally. The competence of being a leader, in some people's view, is inherent with born and laborious to be learned. On the contrary, my perspective is that people are possible and necessary to learn to be a leader.
To begin with, never should we ignore that the essential abilities, required by a competent leader, can also be acquired by consulting others or learning from experience. First, by referring to other senior leaders, a person who doesn’t know how to guide a team will have a deeper understanding of the fundamental skills a supervisor should possess. For example, after communicating with successful leaders, he learns the significance to establish harmonious relationships between team members. By involving all the team members in the decision-making process, he will give subordinates chances to exchange ideas with each other. During this course, they become familiar with other and gradually establish intimate relationships, and thus the whole team will be more likely to collaborate well. Besides, a leader can also learn from his own experiences. He may, for instance, learns to accept the opinions from subordinates instead of being stubborn with his own idea. Specifically, if he sticks to his stereotyped thinking and commits some mistakes, he will gradually realize that accepting others' opinions helps revise the possible errors he ignored. Admittedly, these abilities or characteristics can be acquired naturally, but one can also learn to be a leader by imitating other successful leaders or learning lessons from his own experience.
In addition, being a leader not only requires vital skills but also demands some professional expertise, which can exclusively be learned after born. It is well acknowledged that a good leader should make short-term and long-term plans for the whole team. For example, in order to lead a research team on autonomous driving, an executive should make a time schedule and set milestones for the whole team, so that the individuals in this team will have a precise goal they will fight for. This knowledge of managing a professional team should be learned systematically, otherwise, the productivity of the whole team will be undermined. Besides, a leader should also understand the professional knowledge background of each member. Only in this way can this leader assign specific tasks to each member. For example, he may ask some subordinates to research machine learning and assign some members to study the path planning algorithms. However, it is definitely impossible to obtain the expertise by nature. Only via learning diligently can a leader have a comprehensive understanding of the whole group and guide the team in the right direction.
In conclusion, leadership seldom comes naturally since one will be onerous to lead a team without relevant professional knowledge. One can become a successful leader by learning basic skills and proficiency.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 9.8082437276 245% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2570.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37656903766 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1170846079 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502092050209 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 798.3 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8606569808 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.739130435 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7826086957 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.34782608696 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221849987451 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816043361699 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611509280734 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183795970702 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582191410898 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.