Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The challange of providing pleasent atmosphere for workers has a long story. While some corporations feel they should assign different kinds of activities to workers to make them feel good about the job and themselves, others think opposite way and believe it is better to just leave a special work for employees. I am also strongly of the latter opinion that I will propose my reason in the following essay.
To begin with, the employers should try hardly to remove the waste time in the work. To be more specific, there are some kinds of things, such as the time devoted to learning about new task, that can completely be concieved as a waste time. The more they succeed in decreasing those times, the more productivity they will have. Thus, when workers are having various kinds of activities during their day, they are killling a considerable amount of ther daily worktime in learning new things. This will surely lead employees to feel utterly shameful about themselves because of the low efficiency. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Last year, when I was begin to work as a researcher at the Tehran University, in the very first days, I was just trying a wide range of tasks and knowing more about them. As a result, I was not able to learn anything meaningfully and practically, so I left that job only a few days later because of the low productivity in my work.
Furthermore, the focus is the key in conducting any task in a more better and productive way. I can claim that nothing is more important than having concentration on your duty. This can happen only when someone has a specific mission to accomplish. Dealing with many tasks will destroy the quality of concentration. For example, I have a coworker who is very talented engineer and has some unique and fascanating abilities. However, he can easily lose his productiviy, if he face several tasks to do. I have found out that he is good only if he is set on doing a special task. In this way, he will also have a better feeling about the job and himself. Therefore, if our manager wants to take out more results from my coworker, he should plan to set some similar duties to him.
To summarize, I believe that workers will be more satisfied if they deal only one, at least some totally similiar, task. This is mostly because in this way they will lessen their waste time and they will also have more productivity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hemselves, others think opposite way and believe it is better to just leave a spe...
^^
Line 2, column 37, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'try'.
Suggestion: hardly try
...y. To begin with, the employers should try hardly to remove the waste time in the work. T...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 669, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'begun'.
Suggestion: begun
... example of this. Last year, when I was begin to work as a researcher at the Tehran U...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
... is the key in conducting any task in a more better and productive way. I can claim that no...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'faces'.
Suggestion: faces
... can easily lose his productiviy, if he face several tasks to do. I have found out t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, at least, for example, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6299765808 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64752622356 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519906323185 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5300076987 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8636363636 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4090909091 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68181818182 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261707019687 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736031365535 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475981487003 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148825411471 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390918780243 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.