There is no shortage of debates about how profoundly the interaction between teachers and students can influence students’ learning. With this regard, many people think that students do not respect their teachers as they did before. However, in my opinion, students treat their teachers with respect, but just the shape of the relationship has changed. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, In the process of educational system development, the appearance has altered, but the principles and moral values remain as before. According to researchers, the more friendly the interaction is, the more effective students can learn their lesson. Students who are able to build friendly relationships with their teachers do not usually experience extreme stress during their studies. They can ask their questions, discussing their thoughts without difficulty. As a result, students can better find their potentials and areas of interest, which eventually results in their becoming qualified students. Hence, educational system evolution has brought about these changes for both students and teachers to achieve a desirable outcomes.
Secondly, today, the gap in relationships has almost removed and people found their relationships based on human rights regardless age, education, social status, and etc. Obviously, children are not exceptions to this rule. They prefer to be friend with their teacher apart from some differences between them, which never means a lack of respect. As a result, students have a real image of their teachers, not a delusion. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Many years ago, when I was an elementary student, I always see my teachers as they do not feel as we do, and their needs are different from ours. As a result, I did not have enough confidence to ask my questions, and some concepts of materials remained ambiguous to me for a long time. Hence, I strongly believe that students are not rude today, but they are just more mature and sociable comparative to the past students.
In conclusion, according to what I mentioned above, I strongly believe that students treat their teachers as much as before but in a different way. Since they are more sociable as well as mature, the shape of relationships has changed and converted into a friendly one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 740, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'outcome'?
Suggestion: outcome
...nts and teachers to achieve a desirable outcomes. Secondly, today, the gap in relatio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...gardless age, education, social status, and etc. Obviously, children are not exceptions ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...at their teachers as much as before but in a different way. Since they are more sociable as well a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20418848168 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85481016273 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531413612565 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8551365847 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268838826561 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845685413975 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882694412968 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17535547192 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572220642596 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.