The rules that societies expect young people are too strict than they were in the past.

Essay topics:

The rules that societies expect young people are too strict than they were in the past.

In the modern era, the world and all the equations relevant to the past has been changing so fast. One of these changes is the way societies impose rules on the youngesters. In this regard, many might opine today young people are free of strict and redundant rules, others, however, disagree. I personally subscribe to the view that they have more freedom relative to the past, I cling to this standpoint for two main reasons, which I will elucidate in the following essay.
To begin with, young adult nowadays can freely decide for their life and future, despite young people in the past. To be more specific, in the past, the society impose some tight restriction about their marriage and private lives. Youths today, in contrast, can easily decide about their marriages and can better manage their lives. For a tangible example, my mother in the past despite all she had been suffering in her life, was enforced to live with my father because the society did not accept single woman, and they were considered to be redundant or to have some moral problems. While today, young people did not feel any force about their mrriages and as soon as they realize that their relationships is getting to end, decide to devorce without any sever suffer.
Second, in the past parents got themselves more involved in their children's lives, while today they are more autonomous of their familis and society do not condomn them because of this independency. For instance, in the past, to choose their future career, yougsters had to consult with their parents, but noadays societie give them the right to lead their own lives as an independet human not merely an attachment of a whole as family. Fortunately, today the societies as a whole tend to globlization. They inspire from each other and merged the cultures. One of the major factor that has resulted in such remarkable difference is the emergence of technology especially socila
To put all in a nutshell, considering all the aforementioned points and examples, I firmly believe that youngesters today have moree freedom in comparison with young people in the past. I feel so because not only do they freely decide about their future and private lives, but thay are being recognized as independet human being despite youths in the past.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the modern era, the world and all the...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: much might; a good deal of might
...les on the youngesters. In this regard, many might opine today young people are free of st...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will elucidate in the following essay. To begin with, young adult nowadays can ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to devorce without any sever suffer. Second, in the past parents got themselv...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rgence of technology especially socila To put all in a nutshell, considering al...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, while, for instance, i feel, in contrast, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89175257732 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53636533499 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525773195876 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.9719580844 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.533333333 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8666666667 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238026886666 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848153632892 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390759389447 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151515566319 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350645001718 0.0645574589148 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.