Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The issue of employment has been a controversial issue among experts since the economic fortune in any country depends on the policies governments adopt toward this matter. In this regard, some people may opine that it is more beneficial for businesses to employ people for their entire life. Others, however, disagree. I personally subscribe to the view that implementing such a policy would not result in great outcomes. I cling to this standpoint for two main reasons, which I will elucidate in the following essay.
To begin with, employees would lose their motivation to compete, which results in flourishing. It is more instinctive trait than subjective that human beings would not starve in unrestricted conditions. As a result, employees hired for a long time will not make any effort to stabilize their position or a promotion. When you are in danger of losing something precious, naturally make your best to preserve it. Not only that but this policy will kill the sense of competition in the workplace, which remarkably influences employees’ flourishing and success in their field of profession.
Second, businesses will not succeed anymore since the prosperity of any business is tightly intertwined with the flourishing of the members. How can we imagine a company with such employees can be a winner in the rivalry world. This policy is nothing more than a communism in which people do not compete with each other, and thereby, no achievement would be obtained. For a tangible example, I worked for a company which produced cheese for about 5 years. Surprisingly, the company had always taken this approach since the company opened. I was sure that the company was doomed to fail because there was nobody tried to make any innovation to optimum the brand. As a result, the younger companies which also produced cheese establish the hiring policy based on the qualification of the personal. As a result, after 5 years the company was eliminated from the stage since others provided new taste in cheese, which grabbed the attention of people, and thereby, gained a lot of money. As we see, had not the company adopt such policy, it would have been a great opponent and remained on the stage for a longer period of time.
To put all into a nutshell, I firmly disagree with hiring employees for their entire lives since not only does it hinder them from flourishing due to lack of competition and motivation, but it also forces the business to go into tailspins.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | Pandalove | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Majid1369708090 | 76 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | gaoxiangluke | 76 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | swapnil.paliwal | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | S_Daftari | 80 | view |
- 83
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 73
- do you agree or disagree The most important problems in the world will be solved in our lifetime 65
- Some people believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment and only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 84
- TOEFL essay: Some people think that the family is the most important influence on young adults. Other people think that friends are the most important influence on young adults. Which view do you agree with? Use examples to support your position. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 983, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...le, and thereby, gained a lot of money. As we see, had not the company adopt such ...
^^
Line 3, column 1108, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... and remained on the stage for a longer period of time. To put all into a nutshell, I firmly ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, so, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96875 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78730807542 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3330729159 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.35 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165054210595 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489393824438 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525957520178 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116321061455 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403379478339 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.